An Antitrust Puzzle

by on March 18, 2006

The article I discussed in my previous post also raises an interesting policy question:

While this may be good news for buyers of Vista, it is not for anyone who makes a living from selling anti-spyware software. The worldwide market has boomed recently, reaching $97 million in revenue in 2004, up 240.4 percent from a year earlier, according to IDC. However, companies such as Webroot Software and Sunbelt Software are in for tough times, analysts said. “The aftermarket for Windows anti-spyware is going to dry up almost completely,” said Yankee Group analyst Andrew Jaquith. “Windows Defender is going to become the default anti-spyware engine, certainly for most consumers that have Vista machines.”

Should the Department of Justice prosecute Microsoft’s bundling of Windows Defender as an antitrust violation? I’m particularly curious to hear from those who supported the Department of Justice’s antitrust case in the 1990s. Because I assume that most of them would say “no,” but I’m having trouble seeing any relevant differences between the cases, aside from the fact that Netscape had better political connections than do Webroot and Sunbelt.

SHARE:

Tim Lee / Timothy B. Lee (Contributor, 2004-2009) is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute. He is currently a PhD student and a member of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton University. He contributes regularly to a variety of online publications, including Ars Technica, Techdirt, Cato @ Liberty, and The Angry Blog. He has been a Mac bigot since 1984, a Unix, vi, and Perl bigot since 1998, and a sworn enemy of HTML-formatted email for as long as certain companies have thought that was a good idea. You can reach him by email at leex1008@umn.edu.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: