Will the UN take over Net governance?

by on February 13, 2012 · 3 comments

Over at TIME.com I write that we should keep a close eye on moves by Russia, China and other countries to move Internet governance to the UN:

>All this year, and culminating in December at the World Conference on International Telecommunications in Dubai, the nations of the world will be negotiating a treaty to govern international telecommunications services between countries. It is widely believed that some countries, including Russia and China, will take the opportunity to push for U.N. control of Internet governance. Such a turn of events would certainly be troubling. …

>It’s amazing to think about it, but no state governs the Internet today. Decisions about its architecture are made by consensus among engineers and other volunteers. And that, in fact, is what has kept it open and free.

>“Upending the fundamentals of the multi-stakeholder model is likely to Balkanize the Internet at best, and suffocate it at worst,” FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell said recently in a speech. “A top-down, centralized, international regulatory overlay is antithetical to the architecture of the Net, which is a global network of networks without borders. No government, let alone an intergovernmental body, can make decisions in lightning-fast Internet time.”

Read the whole thing at TIME.com.

  • Glenn L Mcgrath

    “A top-down, centralized, international regulatory overlay is antithetical to the architecture of the Net”

    Except thats how DNS works, maybe we can fix that in time, but there is no solution on the horizon.

    “No government, let alone an intergovernmental body, can make decisions in lightning-fast Internet time”

    Which is why government shouldn’t be involved at all.

    The US government demonstrated during the wikileaks DNS takedown that they are capable and willing to politically interferse with the DNS system.

    Why is it that authorities go after Anonymous and other DDDOsers, but didnt go after everydns DDOSers ?

  • Pingback: Tech at Night: The Return of the Revenge. Google Motorola deal approved. Spectrum. Skeptical of Telecommunications Act changes.

  • http://twitter.com/camburizinho camburizinho

    The idea that “no state governs the Internet today” is flawed. The whole DNS system actually falls under the jurisdiction of California in the actual system, which is what worries several countries, that the US government can, de facto, overrule the open decision making system. Putting it under the UN does not mean a “top-down, centralized” governance, the multi-stake holder model is exactly the opposite of that. 

Previous post:

Next post: