What Do Prince and H.R. 1586 Have in Common?

by on August 9, 2010 · 3 comments

Give up?

Both have adopted highly unconventional names in their lifetimes. In Prince’s case, it was the adoption of a symbol to protest Warner Brothers’ artistic and financial control of his output.

Following suit, H.R. 1586 has adopted the name, the “______Act of____,” apparently because of the haste with which the Senate wanted to pass the bill last week.

The Senate’s substitute amendment on this $26 billion spending bill had a placeholder bill name, and it could not take time to replace the placeholder. The House is expected to return this week and pass the Senate amendment, sending it to the president.

As reported on the WashingtonWatch.com blog and cnet news, this highly unconventional name may be what goes into law. With the Senate out of town until September, there is no chance to pass a correcting amendment in both houses. The constitution requires both to pass identical bills, so the House must take up the “______Act of____” and pass it as such.

If it does, the “law with no name” will stand as a lasting tribute to the inattention Congress gives its work. Spending billions of taxpayer dollars is a hurried and casual affair for our lawmakers.

  • Pingback: House Ready to Pass the “Whatever” Bill | Drewt333's Blog

  • http://srynas.blogspot.com/ Steve R.

    Do our Congress people even know what they are passing into law these days?
    Soon we may simply see 2,000 pages o f “_________” to be filled in later.

  • http://twitter.com/AdamSmith51 Adam Smith

    Tsk, tsk…there's no question about what the bill contains….

    And what does this have to do with technology?

Previous post:

Next post: