Google & Apple: In Collusion or Cut-Throat Competition?

by on August 1, 2009 · 6 comments

The iPhone-obsessed blogosphere is atwitter about the Apple”s exclusion of the Google voice application from the iPhone app store. On Friday, the FCC sent letters of inquiry to the two companies as well as AT&T.

Whatever one thinks about whether Apple and AT&T should be able to operate their own networks as they see fit, this cat-fight should at least demonstrate the pointlessness of the investigation opened by the FTC in May as to whether Apple and Google are violating the antitrust laws by having two members of their boards of directors in common: Google CEO Eric Schmidt and former Genentech CEO Art Levinson. If the two companies were, in fact, trying to collude in an anti-competitive manner, they don’t seem to be doing a very good job of it!

Meanwhile, if you don’t like how Apple runs its app store, don’t get an iPhone! If you already have one, you could follow the lead of TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington and simply cancel your existing iPhone contract to get a more “open” phone—such as one powered by Google’s Android operating system.

Me, I’m just waiting for Google Voice to offer number portability so I can start using the service without having to change the number I’ve had for the last five years—and plan to take to my ashen grave (somewhere beyond low Earth orbit).

  • http://www.localtechexperts.com/2009/08/01/google-apple-in-collusion-or-cut-throat-competition-the/ Google & Apple: In Collusion or Cut-Throat Competition? | The … – Local Tech Experts

    [...] original post here: Google & Apple: In Collusion or Cut-Throat Competition? | The … :antitrust, apple, at-ampt, fcc, News, patents, space, trademark No comments for this entry [...]

  • http://techliberation.com/2009/08/02/newsflash-to-fcc-iphone-is-a-closed-platform-and-consumers-love-it/ Newsflash to FCC: iPhone is a Closed Platform, and Consumers Love It

    [...] Just when you thought the FCC’s investigation of the wireless industry couldn’t get any stranger, TechCrunch reports that the Commission has sent letters to AT&T, Apple, and Google inquiring about Apple’s recent decision to reject the Google Voice app from the iPhone App Store (as Berin discussed yesterday). [...]

  • http://www.openmarket.org/2009/08/02/newsflash-to-fcc-the-iphone-is-a-closed-platform-and-consumers-love-it/ Newsflash to FCC: The iPhone is a Closed Platform, and Consumers Love It | OpenMarket.org

    [...] Just when you thought the FCC’s investigation of the wireless industry couldn’t get any stranger, TechCrunch reports that the Commission has sent letters to AT&T, Apple, and Google inquiring about Apple’s recent decision to reject the Google Voice app from the iPhone App Store (as Berin discussed yesterday). [...]

  • http://techliberation.com/2009/08/03/where-is-fcc-authority-to-regulate-in-apple-google-spat-what-are-the-costs/ Where is FCC Authority to Regulate in Apple-Google Spat? What are the Costs?

    [...] statutory authority, there are other reasons to be concerned about FCC interference in this matter. Berin and Ryan have already pointed out the other side of the story: That this is just old-fashion [...]

  • rsgold

    It's not ridiculous. Nowhere in the developer contract does it say that Apple will cover the entire cost of a refund for apps that have been rejected from the App Store. It seems ridiculous to me that any developer would expect that from Apple or any publisher.
    runescape money

  • rsgold

    It's not ridiculous. Nowhere in the developer contract does it say that Apple will cover the entire cost of a refund for apps that have been rejected from the App Store. It seems ridiculous to me that any developer would expect that from Apple or any publisher.
    runescape money

Previous post:

Next post: