A Downside to Banning Silent Cell Phone Cameras?

by on January 27, 2009 · 15 comments

Adam raises some important questions below about the legislation introduced in Congress to ban silent cell phone cameras. Like many things Congress does, I wonder if the proposed solution might end up being worse than the perceived problem.

Is cell phone camera voyeurism actually a serious problem in the U.S.? Or is this just another problem being blown out of proportion by politicians? Some actual data on the incidence of camera phone “predation” would be useful in deciding whether digital voyeurism is a matter that demands Congress’s attention. The bill’s current language offers up only the vague statement, “Congress finds that children and adolescents have been exploited by photographs taken in dressing rooms and public places with the use of a camera phone.”

I also wonder why the legislation targets phones rather than silent compact cameras of all sorts. Ridding from the market all silent mobile phone cameras would just make bad guys switch to compact, silent cameras with memory cards. (That’s not to say that Congress should ban them, either).

There’s a case to be made that in some situations, it might actually be a good thing for people to have cell phones equipped with silent cameras. What about somebody who’s being assaulted, or mugged, or raped and wants to photograph their attacker but fears retaliation? Or someone who’s just witnessed a crime, unbeknownst to the perpretator, and is trying to get a snapshot of the fleeing suspect? Or a whistleblower who wants to collect evidence of illicit activity by snapping covert photos?

To be sure, these are all hypothetical, unlikely scenarios. But for all we know, incidents involving “cell phone predators” are just as unlikely. And the person with the “good” use for their silent cell phone camera is much more likely to be impacted by a ban, because the bad guys will just skirt the law by hacking their phones or buying regular cameras.

  • dm

    This policy has been in place in Japan for some time.

    And you're quite right that the bad guys do employ cameras concealed in various ways — but they always have done so.

    I suspect that this policy is more for the comfort of the people around the cell-phone user (particularly in locker rooms and similar environments).

  • Jason

    While internet predation and pedophilia is part of the problem, the biggest reason is internet bullying. Unpopular students are photographed in the school changerooms by bullies and then the pictures are posted online.

  • Awesomer Jason

    Since “bullies” are typically physically bigger than the unpopular kids they pick on, wouldn't they just point and laugh while taking said locker room photo? A camera going click isn't going to stop the bullying. In fact I'd predict the opposite would happen where a classmate would use a camera to capture bullying.

  • alvaaclay1980

    There’s a case to be made that in some situations, it might actually be a good thing for people to have cell phones equipped with silent cameras. What about somebody who’s being assaulted, or mugged, or mocospace.com raped and wants to photograph their attacker but fears retaliation? Or someone who’s just witnessed a crime

  • http://www.mobileworld.pk mobileworld

    I don't think silent mobile cameras are the the real problem. It's the wrong use of them. Same is the case with many useful things around that are part of our life. If some dunk driver hit and kill someone while speeding, should we ban alcohol or cars.

  • mobileworld

    I don't think silent mobile cameras are the the real problem. It's the wrong use of them. Same is the case with many useful things around that are part of our life. If some dunk driver hit and kill someone while speeding, should we ban alcohol or cars.

  • mobileworld

    I don't think silent mobile cameras are the the real problem. It's the wrong use of them. Same is the case with many useful things around that are part of our life. If some dunk driver hit and kill someone while speeding, should we ban alcohol or cars.

  • Pingback: no no hair removal does it work yahoo

  • Pingback: LINK

  • Pingback: Phen375 where to buy

  • Pingback: buy vine followers

  • Pingback: Cigarette electronique

  • Pingback: premier league thailand

  • Pingback: More bonuses

  • Pingback: бобини

Previous post:

Next post: