A Boon for Copyright’s Biggest Holders?

by Braden Cox on August 14, 2008 · Comments

Tim has already analyzed the decision of the Federal Circuit in Jacobsen v. Katzer, but I’d go even further than he did and say that it could broadly impact the media and software industries. Because violating a condition to copyright can avail a plaintiff to seek greater damages than breach of contract, look for copyright owners to limit the scope of a license to use or redistribute a song or a software program by making them “conditions” of the copyright license and not contractual “covenants.”

The case is good for copyright owners that use open source licenses. But the rationale of the decision is not limited to only open source.  And who relies on copyright the most? RIAA and MPAA. It’s only a decision of an interlocutory appeal, but copyright holders everywhere will be reviewing their licenses after this one. My fellow tech transactional attorney friends could be busy, as what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

Comments Posted in: Copyright, Open Source, Open Standards & Peer Production

  • Carme
    As the CAFC judges write in the opinion, the purpose of copyright is to preserve the monetary value of protected works. Once someone buys a book or a song, he doesn't need a license to use them in a way allowed by copyright law.

    The opinion states that if a license offers additional freedoms beyond those allowed by copyright then breaching the license takes away those freedoms and the rules revert to those of copyright.

    A license that tries to take away freedoms allowed by copyright law was not considered, but it if is treated in the same way then once it's breached the normal rules of copyright would apply, which makes the license moot.
  • Noah Clements
    I think the main import is not necessarily what is allowed or disallowed by copyright holders, but what remedies are available for breach.
  • When do non-free song or software vendors ever allow consumers to make and distribute copies of their products?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: