Metering Bandwidth and Stopping Fraud

by on June 3, 2008 · 6 comments

Time Warner rolled out data metering in Beaumont, Texas on Thursday, a development that might inspire many in the pro net neutrality regulation camp to cry foul. However, bandwidth metering is probably a fairer and more transparent way to deal with the vast disparities in usage amongst broadband subscribers. Rather than claiming “unlimited” service and then proceeding to restrict access in a few dozen ways, metering gives unlimited use to a point, and then asks heavy users to pay their fair share.

I had an exchange with Robert X. Cringely over email recently. He was responding to a newsletter released by CEI about network neutrality regulation. Amongst his many helpful insights in our exchange he made a keen observation about the real issue in this debate, namely fraud:

The carrier sells me something he claims is unrestricted and unlimited within specific bandwidth guarantees then it turns out that’s not true. It’s unlimited and yet there is a limit. It is unrestricted and yet there are restrictions. Not even the bandwidth is what it is claimed to be. That’s not network management, it is fraud. It is not capitalism, it is fraud. The alternative isn’t socialism but simple contract compliance.

I agree wholeheartedly with Cringely on this issue. Claims of “unlimited” anything should be met with suspicion, especially unlimited bandwidth. However, instead of mandating that restrictions be lifted and some management methods be outlawed, why don’t we just outlaw these fraudulent claims?

Were we to make claims of “unlimited” bandwidth in advertising illegal, we’d face a far better future than one with mandated neutrality. In a fraud-free world, we can have networks advertised as metered, managed, or really unlimited (total free-for-alls). It’s likely that consumers will drift away from truly unlimited networks if BitTorrent and other bandwidth-hogging protocols continue to chew up networks.

In a mandated neutrality world, however, consumers will have fewer choices. Managed networks that provide reliable access to average consumers won’t be able to exist depending on the regulatory regime. If shaping, throttling, outright blocking, or any combination of management techniques are banned, it may be that the service that best fits your needs won’t be allowed to exist.

Cringley is right when he says what we need is contract compliance. We also need to ban the bait and switch routine of “unlimited” for managed and limited. Honesty and honoring contracts is at the heart of any free-market system. So, the alternative to today’s system shouldn’t be a government controlled one, but rather one that is actually much more capitalist.

SHARE: 6 comments

Cord Blomquist / Cord Blomquist spends most of his time pining for the singularity. To pass the time while waiting for this convergence, he serves as the New Media Manager at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Before landing this sweet gig, Cord hocked policy writing for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, toiled in the halls of Congress, and even worked in a crouton factory. In college, Cord spent his hours studying political philosophy and artificial intelligence, resulting in an unhealthy obsession with Lt. Commander Data. All of these activities will, of course, be viewed as laughable when he is ported from this crude meatspace into the nanobot cloud.

  • http://enigmafoundry.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/the-riaa-loses-but-doesnt-realize-it-or-boycotting-the-riaa-has-never-made-more-sense-or-been-easier/ enigma_foundry

    However, instead of mandating that restrictions be lifted and some management methods be outlawed, why don’t we just outlaw these fraudulent claims?,/i>

    Don’t need to outlaw that, that’s exactly what class action lawsuit is for.

    But where were your comments about fraud way back when Comcast was doing exactly the opposite of what it’s own FAQS said it was doing?

    http://techliberation.com/2007/10/20/is-comcast-discriminating-against-bittorrent/

  • http://enigmafoundry.wordpress.com eee_eff

    However, instead of mandating that restrictions be lifted and some management methods be outlawed, why don’t we just outlaw these fraudulent claims?,/i>

    Don’t need to outlaw that, that’s exactly what class action lawsuit is for.

    But where were your comments about fraud way back when Comcast was doing exactly the opposite of what it’s own FAQS said it was doing?

    http://techliberation.com/2007/10/20/is-comcast…>

  • http://bennett.com/blog Richard Bennett

    Cringely is mistaken about ISP claims. They don’t say it’s unlimited or guarantee a rate. He should enroll in an adult literacy program and learn to read. There is no basis in any broadband package for his claim that: “The carrier sells me something he claims is unrestricted and unlimited within specific bandwidth guarantees then it turns out that’s not true.”

  • http://bennett.com/blog Richard Bennett

    Cringely is mistaken about ISP claims. They don’t say it’s unlimited or guarantee a rate. He should enroll in an adult literacy program and learn to read. There is no basis in any broadband package for his claim that: “The carrier sells me something he claims is unrestricted and unlimited within specific bandwidth guarantees then it turns out that’s not true.”

  • Pingback: Carriers Begin Metering Bandwidth… BroadbandCensus.com Will Be Measuring It! | Broadband Breakfast

  • Pingback: Time Warner Cable & Usage-Based Pricing, Take Two

Previous post:

Next post: