Tim Lee
No Intelligence Allowed
Since ads for Ben Stein’s “Intelligent Design” movie is on heavy rotation over on the right-hand side of the page, now seems like a good time to reiterate that most of the ads on this site are automatically placed by Google, and shouldn’t be taken as an endorsement by TLF or any of its contributors. Ron Bailey’s take on Expelled seems pretty spot-on to me.
April 21, 2008 | Comments |
status via twitter
Murdering the Wayne parents, creating Batman · 2 minutes ago
recent comments (follow comments)
-
Welcome
-
Archives
Search
Polls
Categories
- Biotech
- Broadband and Neutrality Regulation
- Competition Policy
- Copyright
- DMCA, DRM, and Piracy
- E-commerce taxation & regulation
- E-Government & Transparency
- First Amendment / free speech
- Inside the Beltway (Politics)
- Internet Governance
- Media Regulation
- Miscellaneous
- Open Source, Open Standards, and Peer Production
- Patents
- Podcast
- Privacy and Government Surveillance
- Sin on the 'Net
- Space
- Tech Pork
- Technology, Business, and Cool Toys
- Telecom and Cable Regulation
- Things that go 'Bump' in the 'Net
- Uncategorized
- What We're Reading
- Wireless and Spectrum Policy
Contributors
Tech Policy
- The 463 Blog
- ACT Blog
- CDT Blog
- Danny Weitzner – Open Internet Policy
- Declan's Politech
- Discovery's Disco-Tech
- EFF's Deep Links
- Freedom to Tinker
- I, Cringely (Robert X. Cringley)
- IP & Democracy (Cynthia Brumfield)
- Lawrence Lessig
- The Long Tail Blog (Chris Anderson)
- Many 2 Many
- Matthew Ingram.com
- Media and Communications Policy Blog
- Nick Carr
- Public Knowledge
- The PFF Blog
- Space Politics
- Susan Crawford
- Tech Daily Dose
- The Technium (Kevin Kelly)
- Technology 360 (Dennis Haarsager)
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog (Eric Goldman)
- Technology Law Update
- Tel Me Tech
- TeleFrieden (Rob Frieden)
Tech News
Bloggers We Like
Our Sites
Where We Work
-
Sponsors

Add New Comment
Viewing 2 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I'm inclined to agree with the atheists, even though I am a Christian myself, who despise "Christian atheists" like Dawkins, PZ Myers, Dennet and Hitchens. You cannot on the one hand teach that the fundamental truth about how species advance is that the sick and unfit die off, and then fall back on Christian morals on providing for the sick and weak. It's a real cognitive dissonance that comes from the fact that most supporters of TENS base their arguments on how society should function if TENS be true, almost entirely on emotion rather than reason. It's emotion that causes the reaction in Dawkins that says that he would not like to live in a society that runs itself according to how TENS alleges the entire natural world operates.
I could understand the argument that we need to rise above nature, but both religion and science tend to agree that man is a slave to his nature. It's philosophers who, without any serious evidence, tell us that we can aspire to be fundamentally more than what we are by nature.
From where I stand, most TENS supporters in America try to live a version of Christianity. They try to live our truth by denying everything that TENS would tell them about nature and themselves, while preaching TENS. I think it is because they are scared shitless of what it would feel like to actually embrace the worldview that is natural if you truly believe that TENS explains the mysteries of life.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks