Why both M and AO ratings for games?

by on December 14, 2007 · 12 comments

During the course of promoting the recent paper I co-wrote with Eli Lehrer, I have come across the same question/complaint from gamers: Why have two adult ratings, both M and AO, when seemingly they perform the same role?

The answer is that they don’t.

The key difference between M and AO is that M is sold in stores like Best Buy and Wal-Mart, while AO is not. This is analogous to movies. While both NC-17 movies and X movies are only available to adults, X rated movies are definitely not sold in Wal-Mart. Though this isn’t an official ESRB stance, most every retailer, large and small will not carry AO games if it sells games to a general audience.

I think this makes sense for video games and movies. There is a difference between sexual and pornographic, just as there is a difference between violence and snuff. Some things are adult, other things are very adult. It’s reasonable to expect that many adults wouldn’t want that level of material in the average store, not only preferring it be kept away from kids, but kept away from them as well. Hence why AO games are usually only available online and why X rated movies are usually placed in adults-only areas of stores or sold at specialty stores.

X and AO are different in that AO is an actual rating, while X is simply a placeholder as the pornographic movie industry doesn’t participate in the MPAA’s CARA rating system. That’s different with video games, because when a company has agreed to have its games rated by the ESRB, it agrees to have all of its games rated by the ESRB.

So, when Sierra submits Leisure Suit Larry, they get an AO, because the game is explicitly sexual throughout. Most adult games, however, are made by publishers that only publish adult games. Sierra, however, publishes a wide variety so it and other publishers choose to stay in good standing with the ESRB and submit their explicitly adult games.

The ESRB only lists 23 AO games on its website. I don’t know if this is a complete list, but compare that tiny number to 1139 M rated games listed. Clearly AO is reserved for a tiny minority of extreme cases. So, why the complaints?

  • http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/ Seth Schoen

    X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_

    So MPAA doesn’t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.

  • http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/ Seth Schoen

    X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17

    So MPAA doesn’t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.

  • http://cordblomquist.com Cord Blomquist

    I realize this. I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated. In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.

  • http://cordblomquist.com Cord Blomquist

    I realize this. I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated. In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.

  • http://illspirit.com illspirit

    Hmm, I’m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don’t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.

    After all, there’s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as “obscenity” if shown to a minor. E.G. “Inside Deep Throat” (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), “The Dreamers,” or “Lust, Caution.” Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.

  • http://illspirit.com illspirit

    Hmm, I’m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don’t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.

    After all, there’s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as “obscenity” if shown to a minor. E.G. “Inside Deep Throat” (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), “The Dreamers,” or “Lust, Caution.” Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.

  • http://xvideos.dreamhosters.com xvideos

    Now many gamers do not like their rating's result anymore.

  • http://www.tourtravelchina.com China Travel Deals

    Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.

  • http://www.tourtravelchina.com China Travel Deals

    Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.

  • http://www.tourtravelchina.com China Travel Deals

    Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.

  • http://www.tourtravelchina.com China Travel Deals

    Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.

  • http://www.sinohotel.com/english/hotels/beijing/index.html Beijing Hotels Reservation

    Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.

Previous post:

Next post: