Take the Money

by on November 15, 2007 · 4 comments

Via Slashdot, I think this is intended to illustrate an appalling lack of civic-mindedness among voters. But I’m more incredulous at the number of people who wouldn’t take the money:

Only 20 percent said they’d exchange their vote for an iPod touch. But 66 percent said they’d forfeit their vote for a free ride to NYU. And half said they’d give up the right to vote forever for $1 million. But they also overwhelmingly lauded the importance of voting.

A million dollars in exchange for never voting again? You’d be an idiot not to take that deal, and I bet that a lot of people who said they wouldn’t take it are lying to the pollsters because they know that’s the answer they’re supposed to give. If there were actually a million dollars on the table, I would be shocked if less than 80 percent of people took it. I mean, look: if you’re feeling guilty about not doing your civic duty, take the money and use half of it to write hundreds of $2300 checks to the politicians you would have voted for. Large campaign contributions have a much bigger impact on the outcome of the election than a single vote does, and you’d have much more freedom to target your contributions in ways that will affect the outcomes of political debates.

  • http://www.techlawforum.net Erik Schmidt

    A million dollars in exchange for never voting again? You’d be an idiot not to take that deal

    I suppose you’re right, if you’re thinking only in terms of efficiency.

    But what if I don’t want to cut all those checks and have my political leanings on the public record? How would I teach my children about the importance of voting if I myself routed around the system? How would I teach them about the value of hard work?

    What if I don’t believe in political parties or political lobbies? What if I think the massive amounts of money involved in politics are at the root of Americans’ mistrust of government?

    Sure, getting a million bucks in return for my voting rights would be great. But I wouldn’t characterize it as a completely lopsided exchange.

  • http://www.techlawforum.net Erik Schmidt

    A million dollars in exchange for never voting again? You’d be an idiot not to take that deal


    I suppose you’re right, if you’re thinking only in terms of efficiency.


    But what if I don’t want to cut all those checks and have my political leanings on the public record? How would I teach my children about the importance of voting if I myself routed around the system? How would I teach them about the value of hard work?


    What if I don’t believe in political parties or political lobbies? What if I think the massive amounts of money involved in politics are at the root of Americans’ mistrust of government?


    Sure, getting a million bucks in return for my voting rights would be great. But I wouldn’t characterize it as a completely lopsided exchange.

  • Henry Miller

    I’d take the money but then vote anyway. This is one of the few cases where I’d feel good about breaking a contract.

  • Henry Miller

    I’d take the money but then vote anyway. This is one of the few cases where I’d feel good about breaking a contract.

Previous post:

Next post: