Music Industry Booming, Part 2

by Tim Lee on January 29, 2007 · Comments

Chris Anderson points out another thriving sector of the music industry:

Music as a digital product enjoys near-zero costs of production and distribution–classic abundance economics. When costs are near zero, you might as well make the price zero, too, something thousands of bands have figured out.

Meanwhile, the one thing that you can’t digitize and distribute with full fidelity is a live show. That’s scarcity economics. No wonder the average price for a ticket was $61 last year, up 8%–in an era when digital products are commodities, there’s a premium on experience. No surprise that bands are increasingly giving away their recorded music as marketing for their concerts, which offer something no MP3 can match.

Live performance is the fastest growing part of the music industry (up 16% in 2006 to a record $3.6 billion in North America) and with services such as SonicLiving (brilliantly described as a “digital-to-analog lifestyle converter”) and TourFilter that notify you when some band in your library is coming to town, that’s only going to grow more.

So there’s big money in live shows (92% of the Rolling Stones’ revenues comes from performance, not recorded music). Sadly for the labels, they don’t get any of it. No wonder they’re so against free music. It only helps the bands (and consumers)!

When discussing the economics of copyright, it needs to be constantly kept in mind that the interests of artists and the companies that distribute their content are not always aligned. The distributor only benefits from the revenues generated by the product being sold. The artist, however, also receives publicity benefits from wide distribution of his product. It makes perfect sense, then, that many bands especially up-and-coming ones put a higher priority on getting their music to as many fans as possible than they do to maximizing revenue in the short term. Being less concerned about piracy is one aspect of this phenomenon. But even in a world with no piracy, many bands would find it in their interest to give a lot of their music away for free in order to build their fan base.

Comments Posted in: Copyright

  • Tim
    Noel, I still don't know what you're talking about. Does "digital copyright policies" mean the DMCA? I have never advocated that the copyrights of artists not be respected and enforced.
  • Well, unless digital copyright policies are respected and enforced, thats what happens Tim. If I misrepresented your views, then please clarify.

    Its funny, you claim to support musicians by saying how they labels do not always have their interest in mind, but the person who has an interest *against* these artists is you Tim.
  • Nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do.

    Noel, when have I ever said that musicians should be forced to waive their copyrights? You keep putting words in my mouth, and I really wish you'd knock it off.
  • Actually there are some new music contracts that already count with the concerts revenue.
    So the musician has 2 ways: totally independent or totally explored.
    The middle way is not the path to stardom. But, in this long tail era, stardom is overrated.
  • 1) shouldn't musicians be encouraged to tap the Internet as a revenue stream:)
    2) I believe artists who try to push their music to the widest audience by giving them away for free are interested in the "long term" benefits; but nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do:)
    3) its fine to break down the economics of music copyright into digital and real world, but it doesn't help when doing so distorts your view of the industry. Pricing a song at zero sounds like a witty twist in logic but does not consider the production costs.
    4) when musicians waive some copyright privileges, its not called piracy, thus your claim about zero-piracy inducing artists giving away songs is a scenario of reasoning tripping over linquistics.
    5) you still don't address my point in your previous post about the *thriving music industry.* I raised an issue that the costs of piracy outweighs its benefits.
  • What?!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: