Parents Television Council = Not Good Parents

by on November 22, 2004 · 9 comments

The puritans over at the Parents Television Council are at it again. They have issued a new report entitled “Basic Cable Awash in Raunch” which documents what they believe to be immoral language or behavior on basic cable. They want the government to start regulating “indecency” on basic cable, or at least force cable operators to just sell subscribers they few stations they want.

I’ve addressed the problems with such “a la carte” regulatory schemes elsewhere, so I won’t discuss that again. Rather, I want to specifically address the question of whether the government has any business regulating cable television, a subscription-based service. The PTC thinks so, of course, arguing that: “Children are watching these programs and are being exposed to content that is far more explicit and potentially far more damaging than what they are seeing on broadcast television.”

But why are they letting their children watch these programs if they find them so offensive? Oh, wait, I get it… They’re saying OTHER PEOPLE’S children might be watching these shows, and for God’s sake–and they do mean GOD’S SAKE–we can’t possible let other people’s kids watch these shows, right? We have to make these decisions for all the stupid parents out there who might not understand the ungodly nature of this programming. Parents are just stupid, stupid, stupid! They’re not doing their job! The Almighty State must do their job for them and censor basic cable!


Well, I don’t want to get off on a mean-spirited rant here, but this sort of thinking angers me like nothing else. You see, I’m a parent but I’m also an adult who enjoys most of the programs that the PTC puritans don’t want to see on cable. The PTC has a particular problem with Comedy Central, which in my opinion is probably the best thing to happen to television since the rise of CNN and 24-hour news. Compared to most of the formulaic sitcoms on network television, Comedy Central airs programs that actually make you laugh and think at the same time. Despite it’s vulgar tone, South Park is one of the most intelligent comedies ever produced for television. (By the way PTC puritans, South Park doesn’t usually come on until after 10:00 at night. What aren’t your kids in bed by that time?)

And let’s not forget that cable and satellite TV are subscription-based services. It’s not like those cable and satellite set-top boxes have legs and invade our living rooms without permission. We put them there. We pay good money to put them there. Once they’re there, it doesn’t absolve us of the right to be good parents and monitor our children’s viewing habits. If you are uncomfortable with certain channels, block them out with the remote. Or, here’s a radical thought for the puritans of PTC to consider: try watching some of those shows with your kids and explaining to them what some of these things mean.

The world is full of coarse language, mature themes, sexual perversion and much else. Like millions of other kids out there, the first vulgar language I ever heard, and the first dirty pictures I ever saw, were all on a school playground. (A Catholic school playground, I might add). When I saw and heard such stuff at a young age, I was confused. I was scared to talk to my parents. I thought I might get in trouble. How many millions of kids have had similar experiences?

Now I’m not advocating parents sit down with their toddlers and watch an endless stream of adult-oriented programming on TV, but I do believe that a gradual assimilation into the realities of this world makes sense. I want to be there with my kids to help answer tough questions when they come up. Or I might actually preempt their questions by discussing mature subjects with them before I allow them to view certain types of programming with me.

This is called parental responsibility. It’s not an easy job. Indeed, it is a very difficult job in our modern Information Age, in which kids are bombarded by countless images and sounds. But just because we might object to some of those sights and sounds, that does not make it alright for us to call the government in to censors those sights and sounds out of existence. Denying reality does not make reality go away.

Am I troubled by some of the course language my kids might hear on TV? Of course I am, the same way I am troubled by the fact that they might hear that same language (or worse) on a playground or in a locker room. At least at home I can talk to them about it. I can explain that only immature fools find the need to resort to such language when they are too stupid to find more intelligent words to explain themselves or express emotion.

What about frank sexual language and images? Do I want my kids exposed to endless buffet of that stuff? Again, of course not. But I can block the channels that might run most of that stuff or just make sure my kids aren’t turning on the TV when those shows are on. But when they do see or hear sexual talk or images, I can talk to them about it. I’m not one of these John Ashcroft ‘cover-the-naked-statue’ freaks when it comes to nudity, so this job will be much easier for me than it will for the people at the PTC. (I sometimes wonder if these people even get naked before they have sex. Our society’s silly puritanical streak when it comes to the human body still remains shocking to me.)

Well, I don’t suppose the people over at the PTC care to hear any of this. In their world, there is what they regard are clean, wholesome programming and then there’s everything else. And they want the government to regulate “everything else” on their behalf to make sure we have a nice little sanitized world, free of dirty words and violent images. You see, according to the PTC’s logic, if we can just “clean up” cable, all will be right in the world. Children will grow up to be perfect little angels and speak to each other like British aristocrats at a polo match. And no one will have sex until they get married. (Perhaps if we just show kids enough “Dick van Dyke Show” reruns we can even get married couples to sleep in separate beds again since the human body is just dirty, dirty, dirty!). And if we clean up cable, no one will ever hurt or murder another human again. People only club each other over the heads because they see violent acts on TV. You see, no one ever murdered or robbed someone else before “Kojak” and “Colombo” went on the air.

OK, enough sarcasm. You see how angry these PTC people make me. I’m sorry, I usually don’t talk this way about others, but I have no tolerance for the intolerant. If these people are so scared of what they’re kids might see on their television sets, then they need to deal with that themselves. You PTCers need to be disciplined enough to monitor your own kids and their viewing habits. Stop running to the government to solve your problems and start being good parents.

  • http://WeMatter.com Mike Liveright

    I am against censorship, but I do think that a parent should have the ability to control what their child sees and what they want to see.

    So: I would agree to having them be able to “Turn Off” specific channels and probably have shows V-Chip rated so that they could limit the level of the shows.

    If a person un-subscribes to a channel because it does not carry the material they want, or does not V-Chip their programs, then this information should be sent to the channel so that they can determine if they are loosing viewers…

    Get government involved as little as possible, but use technology to allow people to contron their own destiny.

  • http://WeMatter.com Mike Liveright

    I am against censorship, but I do think that a parent should have the ability to control what their child sees and what they want to see.

    So: I would agree to having them be able to “Turn Off” specific channels and probably have shows V-Chip rated so that they could limit the level of the shows.

    If a person un-subscribes to a channel because it does not carry the material they want, or does not V-Chip their programs, then this information should be sent to the channel so that they can determine if they are loosing viewers…

    Get government involved as little as possible, but use technology to allow people to contron their own destiny.

  • http://tekkamanblade1.homestead.com Dan McClelland

    death to the PTC

  • http://tekkamanblade1.homestead.com Dan McClelland

    death to the PTC

  • Lee

    Call me crazy, but I’ve never understood what it is about “explicit” content that could ever be harmful to anyone. Whether it is nudity, sex, violence, “bad words” or any combination thereof, none of these things are of any consequence whatsoever.

    The assumption within our society that any of this is damaging is one without basis. A good analogy is found by taking a look at some of the attitudes and beliefs of muslim cultures. How silly is it for a woman to be forced to dress up like a beekeeper when going out in public? What about honor killings, where a woman is murdered by her own family because she was raped in order to restore “honor” to the family. There are some muslims who actually believe that if they were to touch a pig, or any product derived from pigs, that they would be sent straight to hell after they die.

    These notions are naturally quite disturbing because they are a denial of the truth. That is exactly how I see our society’s attitudes towards “explicit” content. When I was growing up I used to think that my parents and other adults were trying to con me when they would throw a hissy fit about me watching something on cable. Their concerns were so obviously unfounded that I assumed their concern was really just thinly veiled malice. It never occurred to me until I was well into adulthood that so many people could, through the power of socialization, become so functionally stupid.

    I have never in my 33 years on this earth, ever been given a reasonable explanation as to why exactly T&A on “skinimax” is harmful to anyone of any age. People become uncomfortable when I ask for an explanation. Some rattle off lame excuses, others become indignant and attack me for not “understanding” what they claim is obvious. Well in truth it is obvious. Our society attempts to play keep-away with children when it comes to these things because that is what our parents did, and their parents before them. The idea that such things are harmful is something that everyone is taught from a very early age. Most people don’t question it, which is of course a very serious mistake. The way I see it, most people were not so much raised by their parents as brainwashed by them. Our society’s attitude towards these things is simply an example of brainwashing that is highly uniform and does not vary much from person to person. These notions are no more valid than the idea that women are chattel.

    Lee

  • Lee

    Call me crazy, but I’ve never understood what it is about “explicit” content that could ever be harmful to anyone. Whether it is nudity, sex, violence, “bad words” or any combination thereof, none of these things are of any consequence whatsoever.

    The assumption within our society that any of this is damaging is one without basis. A good analogy is found by taking a look at some of the attitudes and beliefs of muslim cultures. How silly is it for a woman to be forced to dress up like a beekeeper when going out in public? What about honor killings, where a woman is murdered by her own family because she was raped in order to restore “honor” to the family. There are some muslims who actually believe that if they were to touch a pig, or any product derived from pigs, that they would be sent straight to hell after they die.

    These notions are naturally quite disturbing because they are a denial of the truth. That is exactly how I see our society’s attitudes towards “explicit” content. When I was growing up I used to think that my parents and other adults were trying to con me when they would throw a hissy fit about me watching something on cable. Their concerns were so obviously unfounded that I assumed their concern was really just thinly veiled malice. It never occurred to me until I was well into adulthood that so many people could, through the power of socialization, become so functionally stupid.

    I have never in my 33 years on this earth, ever been given a reasonable explanation as to why exactly T&A; on “skinimax” is harmful to anyone of any age. People become uncomfortable when I ask for an explanation. Some rattle off lame excuses, others become indignant and attack me for not “understanding” what they claim is obvious. Well in truth it is obvious. Our society attempts to play keep-away with children when it comes to these things because that is what our parents did, and their parents before them. The idea that such things are harmful is something that everyone is taught from a very early age. Most people don’t question it, which is of course a very serious mistake. The way I see it, most people were not so much raised by their parents as brainwashed by them. Our society’s attitude towards these things is simply an example of brainwashing that is highly uniform and does not vary much from person to person. These notions are no more valid than the idea that women are chattel.

    Lee

  • http://padrachitevtualete.com/zoloft/adverse_effects_side_zoloft.html zoloft panic disorder
  • ROMI

    NO WONDER THE CHILDREN OF THE PTC GROW UP TO BE SISSIES. HOW WILL THEY LEARN ABOUT THE REAL WORLD WHEN THEIR PARENTS WON’T ALLOW THEM TO WATCH IT ON TV. ONCE THEY GROW UP AND LEAVE THEIR WATCHFULL PARENTS, THEY ARE SCARED TO DEATH FROM THE REAL WORLD CAUSE THEY REALISE THE WORLD IS NOT SO GOODY GOODY AS THEY THOUGHT IT WOULD BE.

  • ROMI

    NO WONDER THE CHILDREN OF THE PTC GROW UP TO BE SISSIES. HOW WILL THEY LEARN ABOUT THE REAL WORLD WHEN THEIR PARENTS WON’T ALLOW THEM TO WATCH IT ON TV. ONCE THEY GROW UP AND LEAVE THEIR WATCHFULL PARENTS, THEY ARE SCARED TO DEATH FROM THE REAL WORLD CAUSE THEY REALISE THE WORLD IS NOT SO GOODY GOODY AS THEY THOUGHT IT WOULD BE.

Previous post:

Next post: