Comments on: Will LTE-U Mark the End of the Unlicensed Spectrum Commons? https://techliberation.com/2015/10/14/will-lte-u-mark-the-end-of-the-unlicensed-spectrum-commons/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:17:23 +0000 hourly 1 By: 开设Binance账户 https://techliberation.com/2015/10/14/will-lte-u-mark-the-end-of-the-unlicensed-spectrum-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-139902 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:17:23 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=75868#comment-139902 Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.

]]> By: bskorup https://techliberation.com/2015/10/14/will-lte-u-mark-the-end-of-the-unlicensed-spectrum-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-125074 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:04:00 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=75868#comment-125074 In reply to Steve_Crowley.

I modified the language about the FCC “tolerating” it. I suppose it’s simply part of the game, but it can be and should be mitigated. Why the FCC shouldn’t encourage it is because Congress has given the agency a general mandate to move quickly on new technologies. Considering how quickly the tech and communications industries move, this bias for action seems reasonable and welfare enhancing. Investment dries up quickly when delays mount. The strategy of opposition groups for decades has been to slow FCC proceedings down in order to organize an opposition coalition or extract concessions. By taking seriously this statutory mandate, the FCC can limit what I (and Congress) consider to be pretty damaging delays.

]]> By: Steve_Crowley https://techliberation.com/2015/10/14/will-lte-u-mark-the-end-of-the-unlicensed-spectrum-commons/comment-page-1/#comment-125073 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:00:00 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=75868#comment-125073 The visibility and forthrightness of investors in the TLPS docket is noteworthy but I don’t understand the concern with them. Some are long, some are short. Some make good technical points not made elsewhere in the proceeding. I don’t see why the FCC should not tolerate it, nor what the FCC could do if it didn’t.

]]>