https://techliberation.com/2015/10/09/white-house-support-for-strong-encryption-could-discourage-digital-protectionism/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sat, 07 Feb 2026 19:17:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://techliberation.com/2015/10/09/white-house-support-for-strong-encryption-could-discourage-digital-protectionism/comment-page-1/#comment-138314 Sat, 07 Feb 2026 19:17:01 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=75859#comment-138314 Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me? https://accounts.binance.com/ar-BH/register?ref=S5H7X3LP

]]> https://techliberation.com/2015/10/09/white-house-support-for-strong-encryption-could-discourage-digital-protectionism/comment-page-1/#comment-125077 Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:05:00 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=75859#comment-125077 I’m still around. The recent radical Islamist terrorist attack in Paris has re-invigorated the call to weaken encryption through a so-called “backdoor”. The Washington Post, over the past several months, has had several editorials advocating a so-called “backdoor”. Evidently they don’t understand, despite the many reader comments, that a “backdoor” means that you have no encryption. The sole distorted argument made, is that a “backdoor” is necessary to aid law enforcement. The fact that strong encryption is necessary to protect financial transactions, as one example, is blatently ignored. Oh well.

]]>