Comments on: Net Neutrality and the Dangers of Title II https://techliberation.com/2014/09/26/net-neutrality-and-the-dangers-of-title-ii/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sat, 14 Mar 2026 02:29:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: Binance美国注册 https://techliberation.com/2014/09/26/net-neutrality-and-the-dangers-of-title-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-140076 Sat, 14 Mar 2026 02:29:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=74788#comment-140076 Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.com/register-person?ref=JW3W4Y3A

]]> By: binance https://techliberation.com/2014/09/26/net-neutrality-and-the-dangers-of-title-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-138911 Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:14:38 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=74788#comment-138911 Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.

]]> By: luis https://techliberation.com/2014/09/26/net-neutrality-and-the-dangers-of-title-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-125017 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:26:00 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=74788#comment-125017 “Phone calls are telecommunications because callers are selecting the endpoint–a person associated with the known phone number. Even simple web browsing, however, requires substantial processing by an ISP”

On the we user also select the endpoint: a page.
Your argument about substancial processing is misleading, as nowadays telecoms are doing the same processing if it’s a voice call, or a webpage: IP won. That’s why VoIP and VoLTE exist in the first place.

But the most important flaw in your arguments is that priority over the lanes is good when it comes traffic classes. Not endpoint entities that might have paid extra to slow down their opponents traffic.

]]>