<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Technology Liberation Front &#187; David Rittgers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/tag/david-rittgers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.5.3" -->
	<copyright>2006-2009 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>pjdoland@pjdoland.com (Technology Liberation Front)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>pjdoland@pjdoland.com (Technology Liberation Front)</webMaster>
	<category>Technology Policy News</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>Technology Liberation Front Podcast</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Tech Policy Weekly is the podcast of the Technology Liberation Front, the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>technology, tech, technology policy, internet, communications, regulation, law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="News &#38; Politics" />
	<itunes:category text="Technology" />
	<itunes:author>Technology Liberation Front</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Technology Liberation Front</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>pjdoland@pjdoland.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.techliberation.com/wp-content/uploads/podcast/tpw-album-art-small.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Maryland&#8217;s Asinine Surreptitious Recording Law</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/04/14/marylands-asinine-surreptitious-recording-law/</link>
		<comments>http://techliberation.com/2010/04/14/marylands-asinine-surreptitious-recording-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Government & Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment, Free Speech & Online Child Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy, Security & Government Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology, Business & Cool Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things that Go 'Bump' in the 'Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato@Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rittgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment Handbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=28073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[// < ![CDATA[ // < ![CDATA[ DayPortPlayer.newPlayer({articleID:"22384",accSite:"WMAR",accPos:"CCTVI.NEWS.LOCAL",categoryID:"14",rootCategory:"",domain:"wmar.web.entriq.net",playerInstanceID:"24FAD9E0-DC70-2532-414F-7E6F051C4C2F",videoAdConDefID:"2",videoAdObjectID:"4",bannerAdObjectID:"5"}); // ]]&#62; According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press' First Amendment Handbook, twelve states forbid the recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties. Maryland is one of them. And now a guy who was recording his own antics on a motorcycle is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div style="float: right;"><script src="http://wmar.img.entriq.net/dayportcore/dpm/DayPortPlayers.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
DayPortPlayer.newPlayer({articleID:"22384",accSite:"WMAR",accPos:"CCTVI.NEWS.LOCAL",categoryID:"14",rootCategory:"",domain:"wmar.web.entriq.net",playerInstanceID:"24FAD9E0-DC70-2532-414F-7E6F051C4C2F",videoAdConDefID:"2",videoAdObjectID:"4",bannerAdObjectID:"5"});
// ]]&gt;</script></div>
<p>According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press' <a href="http://www.rcfp.org/handbook/c03p01.html">First Amendment Handbook</a>, twelve states forbid the recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties. Maryland is <a href="http://law.justia.com/maryland/codes/gcj/10-402.html">one of them</a>.</p>
<p>And now a guy who was recording <em>his own</em> antics on a motorcycle is facing a felony charge because he continued recording during a traffic stop. David Rittgers has more <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/04/14/felony-charges-for-recording-a-plainclothes-officer/">on the Cato@Liberty blog</a>.</p>
<p>Laws that ban all surreptitious recording to get at wrongful recording are overbroad and damaging. Laws that prevent the <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/04/13/university-of-maryland-beating-prompts-investigations/">recording of police officers</a> are particularly wrongheaded. Maryland needs some technology liberation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techliberation.com/2010/04/14/marylands-asinine-surreptitious-recording-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
