
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Might Do Not Have to Use Files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee_eff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68814</link>
		<dc:creator>eee_eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Silly Adam, there already is such an entity...it is called Pirate Bay...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly Adam, there already is such an entity&#8230;it is called Pirate Bay&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee_eff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68638</link>
		<dc:creator>eee_eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Silly Adam, there already is such an entity...it is called Pirate Bay...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly Adam, there already is such an entity&#8230;it is called Pirate Bay&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68600</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68600</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great blog post thanks for sharing...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog post thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W. Bell</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68599</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True with regard to works created after the effective date of the &#039;76 Act, Brenner; not so with regard to works created under the 1909 Act.  If, for instance, Walt Disney failed to attach a proper notice when he first published Steamboat Willie, it fell into the public domain regardless of the notice provisions of the &#039;76 Act.  And, indeed, that seems to be the case.  See my post of some months ago on that count.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True with regard to works created after the effective date of the &#39;76 Act, Brenner; not so with regard to works created under the 1909 Act.  If, for instance, Walt Disney failed to attach a proper notice when he first published Steamboat Willie, it fell into the public domain regardless of the notice provisions of the &#39;76 Act.  And, indeed, that seems to be the case.  See my post of some months ago on that count.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenner434</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68598</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenner434</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the 1976 Copyright Act amended the 1909 Act in regards to eliminating formalities. So putting (c)/year  is simply no longer necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; As to the current leg fight, performers and composers have a coalition to end analog radio stations&#039; royalty free use of music; the NAB is fighting this issue vigorously on behalf of its radio membership.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 1976 Copyright Act amended the 1909 Act in regards to eliminating formalities. So putting (c)/year  is simply no longer necessary.<br /><br /> As to the current leg fight, performers and composers have a coalition to end analog radio stations&#39; royalty free use of music; the NAB is fighting this issue vigorously on behalf of its radio membership.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W. Bell</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68590</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68590</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brenner:  Under the 1909 Act, fixation alone did not suffice; many formalities applied.  You&#039;re right about the public performance of analog sound recordings (I&#039;m not sure what you mean by &quot;legislation to award fees&quot;), but a streaming MP3 file probably qualifies as a digital audio transmission under 106(6).  Downloading and listening would not ordinarily be a public performance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenner:  Under the 1909 Act, fixation alone did not suffice; many formalities applied.  You&#39;re right about the public performance of analog sound recordings (I&#39;m not sure what you mean by &#8220;legislation to award fees&#8221;), but a streaming MP3 file probably qualifies as a digital audio transmission under 106(6).  Downloading and listening would not ordinarily be a public performance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenner434</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68589</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenner434</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68589</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Works do not need to be published with formalities to be protected, merely &quot;fixed&quot;.  There is no public performance right in an analog sound recording, though that is the subject of legislation to award fees based on radio play.  Is downloading and listening to a recording a public performance?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works do not need to be published with formalities to be protected, merely &#8220;fixed&#8221;.  There is no public performance right in an analog sound recording, though that is the subject of legislation to award fees based on radio play.  Is downloading and listening to a recording a public performance?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W. Bell</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68575</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And if the novel infringed on U.S. copyrights, you could offer it as a streaming recorded book from overseas from some copypirate haven!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if the novel infringed on U.S. copyrights, you could offer it as a streaming recorded book from overseas from some copypirate haven!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jardinero1</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2010/06/14/you-might-do-not-have-to-use-files/comment-page-1/#comment-68574</link>
		<dc:creator>Jardinero1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=29747#comment-68574</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the plot to a Neal Stephenson novel.  You could call it Cryptocopyrighticon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the plot to a Neal Stephenson novel.  You could call it Cryptocopyrighticon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

