
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuits and Enforcement, not Legislation: Balancing Social Media and Consumer Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/12/01/lawsuits-and-enforcement-not-legislation-balancing-social-media-and-consumer-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/12/01/lawsuits-and-enforcement-not-legislation-balancing-social-media-and-consumer-protection/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Meltzer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/12/01/lawsuits-and-enforcement-not-legislation-balancing-social-media-and-consumer-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-65868</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Meltzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=23961#comment-65868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Braden:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you are reading a bit too much into the acknowledgement from Ari Schwartz.  Historically speaking, almost all attempts to comprehensively legislate in complex areas which involve business and consumer interests, as privacy issues do, result in years of litigation and regulatory enforcement.  This is a necessary part of the process both of better tailoring the legislative intent to the societal realities and of adjusting the outcomes to changing norms and technologies.  Litigation and enforcement are just another part of the process but cannot replace the regulatory schemes.  For examples of this just look at the 1933 and 1934 Acts and the Securities and Exchange Commission and at Title VII and Title IX.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braden:<br /><br />I think you are reading a bit too much into the acknowledgement from Ari Schwartz.  Historically speaking, almost all attempts to comprehensively legislate in complex areas which involve business and consumer interests, as privacy issues do, result in years of litigation and regulatory enforcement.  This is a necessary part of the process both of better tailoring the legislative intent to the societal realities and of adjusting the outcomes to changing norms and technologies.  Litigation and enforcement are just another part of the process but cannot replace the regulatory schemes.  For examples of this just look at the 1933 and 1934 Acts and the Securities and Exchange Commission and at Title VII and Title IX.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Meltzer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/12/01/lawsuits-and-enforcement-not-legislation-balancing-social-media-and-consumer-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-63834</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Meltzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=23961#comment-63834</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Braden:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you are reading a bit too much into the acknowledgement from Ari Schwartz.  Historically speaking, almost all attempts to comprehensively legislate in complex areas which involve business and consumer interests, as privacy issues do, result in years of litigation and regulatory enforcement.  This is a necessary part of the process both of better tailoring the legislative intent to the societal realities and of adjusting the outcomes to changing norms and technologies.  Litigation and enforcement are just another part of the process but cannot replace the regulatory schemes.  For examples of this just look at the 1933 and 1934 Acts and the Securities and Exchange Commission and at Title VII and Title IX.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braden:<br /><br />I think you are reading a bit too much into the acknowledgement from Ari Schwartz.  Historically speaking, almost all attempts to comprehensively legislate in complex areas which involve business and consumer interests, as privacy issues do, result in years of litigation and regulatory enforcement.  This is a necessary part of the process both of better tailoring the legislative intent to the societal realities and of adjusting the outcomes to changing norms and technologies.  Litigation and enforcement are just another part of the process but cannot replace the regulatory schemes.  For examples of this just look at the 1933 and 1934 Acts and the Securities and Exchange Commission and at Title VII and Title IX.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

