Europeans Obstruct Oracle/Sun Deal

by Berin Szoka on November 10, 2009 · Comments

One might have thought European Commission antitrust regulators had their hands full with harassing Microsoft about the “Browser Ballot” (our comments) and fining Intel, but apparently they’re already looking for new targets so they can “stay busy”: Sun disclosed on Monday that the EC had objected to the “combination of Sun’s open source MySQL database product with Oracle’s enterprise database products and its potential negative effects on competition in the market for database products.”

It’s difficult to see how Oracle’s takeover of Sun would reduce competition in the intensely competitive database market.  Since Sun’s MySQL software is open source and uses the strongly “copyleftGNU General Public License (GPL) v2, Oracle will have little control over its future evolution.  If Oracle decided to stop updating MySQL tomorrow, anyone in the MySQL development community could simply “fork” the project.  Oracle knows this. (Do the European regulators?) If anything, Oracle’s proposed acquisition of Sun indicates that they are embracing the business model of commercial open source.  In Sun’s case, that has meant striving to lead the best collaborative project possible and making money on providing the best product support.

European antitrust regulators should be celebrating this deal, rather than obstructing it.

Comments Posted in: Antitrust & Competition Policy, Open Source, Open Standards & Peer Production

  • MySQL has been forked, and not just by anybody -- the two most prominent forks, MariaDB and Drizzle, are from MySQL's founder and one of the preeminent developers, respectively. See http://lwn.net/Articles/329626/

    Presumably the EU's objection is based on protecting SAP, IBM and other direct competitors to Oracle, not the interests of businesses using MySQL and derivatives. Just a guess.
  • Antitrust law should about protecting competition (as a means of enhancing consumer welfare) NOT competitors. But, sadly, I fear you may be correct in your supposition about the EC's motives.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: