Comments on: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal

By: mwendy

mwendy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:36:09 +0000

I think one can conceptualize and develop in both models – open source and proprietary. We see it daily. I don't think open source has a monopoly on the conceptualization process.

That said, for some parts of the open source ecosystem – such as for GPL licenses – the model may have an edge on the proprietary model in that where accessed through skilled technicians, one can see the underlying instructions / code. Thus, in terms of those who can plausibly access the instructions versus closed systems, the potential to conceptualize based on that access might be greater.

But, who knows?

It seems impossible to make any generalizations on this. Ideas also find generation through selfish, moral means. Private property – i.e., proprietary ownership and access – has proven to be one of the greatest wealth and public benefit generating forces man has ever seen.

By: RogerJH

RogerJH — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:51:55 +0000

As I understand it, open source is an asset or commodity that can be used for free. I agree that value cannot be realized without development, but conceptualizing is the essential first step. Without that, you have nothing. If you consider how a country like the US or UK is going to compete with China or India, it is in the generation of ideas, and its concomitant value-add. Such ideas can then be developed (for lower cost), adding to value.

By: mwendy

mwendy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:39:34 +0000

Roger, it seems to me that while open source can be a good way to develop products and services – the latter (i.e., development of products and services), no matter how it occurs, is where true value lies. Conceptualizing – heck, we do that all day. Ideas, if one wants to base risk models on them, must result in other than the ether.

By: mwendy

mwendy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:36:09 +0000

I think one cant conceptualize and develop in both models – open source and proprietary. We see it daily. I don't think open source has a monopoly on the conceptualization process. For some parts of the open source ecosystem, such as for GPL licenses,the model may have an edge on the proprietary model in that – where accessed through skilled technicians – one can see the underlying instructions / code. Thus, in terms of those who can plausibly access the instructions versus closed systems, the potential to conceptualize based on that access might be greater. Who knows. It seems impossible to make any generalization on this.

Ideas also find generation through selfish, moral means. Private property – i.e., proprietary ownership and access – has proven to be one of the greatest wealth and public benefit generating forces man has ever seen.

By: RogerJH

RogerJH — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:51:55 +0000

By: mwendy

mwendy — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:39:34 +0000

By: Berin Szoka

Berin Szoka — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:44:57 +0000

So does this mean the Republicans will have to use Wordpress just out of red team v. blue team spite?

By: RogerJH

RogerJH — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:49:43 +0000

Agreed. It's encouraging to see this official endorsement of open source. Besides software, we are seeing more and more models of open source that are showing proprietary ownership of knowledge is not the only way to capitalize on knowledge. Imaginatively used open source (be it software or some other commodity) shows that the true wealth and value is in conceptualizing. This is the basis of the idea economy.

By: kitchen aid part

kitchen aid part — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:30:45 +0000

The gov should realize what is the professional is it.