<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IAB&#8217;s Brilliant Open Letter to the FTC on Blogger Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:49:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Deal with Blogola: Reputational Incentives, FTC Regulation &#38; a Trust Seal Proposal — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-66402</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Deal with Blogola: Reputational Incentives, FTC Regulation &#38; a Trust Seal Proposal — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-66402</guid>
		<description>[...] One might take from this the lesson that the press, as it evolves from the newspaper model towards something blog-ier but still hard to pin down precisely, can police itself pretty darn well. Alas, the FTC has taken a much dimmer view of the ability of reputational incentives to discipline the influence that might be exerted by &#8220;blogola&#8221; payments (cash or in-kind) on editorial discretion and journalistic creation. Last October, the FTC updated its “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising&#8221; to provide that bloggers should disclose any direct financial interest in subjects they write about if they wish to avoid being subject to an FTC enforcement action—even though no such endorsement is required of traditional journalists, as Adam noted. The best response to this was probably this splendid open letter from Randall Rothenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, as Adam noted here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One might take from this the lesson that the press, as it evolves from the newspaper model towards something blog-ier but still hard to pin down precisely, can police itself pretty darn well. Alas, the FTC has taken a much dimmer view of the ability of reputational incentives to discipline the influence that might be exerted by &#8220;blogola&#8221; payments (cash or in-kind) on editorial discretion and journalistic creation. Last October, the FTC updated its “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising&#8221; to provide that bloggers should disclose any direct financial interest in subjects they write about if they wish to avoid being subject to an FTC enforcement action—even though no such endorsement is required of traditional journalists, as Adam noted. The best response to this was probably this splendid open letter from Randall Rothenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, as Adam noted here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Progress &#38; Freedom Foundation Blog</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-62991</link>
		<dc:creator>The Progress &#38; Freedom Foundation Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-62991</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Crovitz on FTC Blogger Rules...&lt;/strong&gt;

Another great column by the Wall Street Journal&#039;s Gordon Crovitz, who is quickly becoming my favorite tech policy columnist. In today&#039;s column, &quot;Bloggers Mugged by Regulators,&quot; he comments on the FTC&#039;s new disclosure rules for bloggers, which I di...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Crovitz on FTC Blogger Rules&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Another great column by the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Gordon Crovitz, who is quickly becoming my favorite tech policy columnist. In today&#8217;s column, &#8220;Bloggers Mugged by Regulators,&#8221; he comments on the FTC&#8217;s new disclosure rules for bloggers, which I di&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crovitz on FTC Blogger Rules — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-62990</link>
		<dc:creator>Crovitz on FTC Blogger Rules — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-62990</guid>
		<description>[...] by Regulators,&#8221; he comments on the FTC&#8217;s new disclosure rules for bloggers, which I discussed here over the weekend.  Crovitz focuses on the enforcement challenges associated with the new rules and also points out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Regulators,&#8221; he comments on the FTC&#8217;s new disclosure rules for bloggers, which I discussed here over the weekend.  Crovitz focuses on the enforcement challenges associated with the new rules and also points out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwendy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-65295</link>
		<dc:creator>mwendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-65295</guid>
		<description>We should let the speaker police him / herself, aided further by a vibrant marketplace of ideas and information.  The fact the one might get busted by others should be enough to police the &quot;brand&quot; that is the individual blogger.  There is enough information on the web and elsewhere to keep people honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should let the speaker police him / herself, aided further by a vibrant marketplace of ideas and information.  The fact the one might get busted by others should be enough to police the &#8220;brand&#8221; that is the individual blogger.  There is enough information on the web and elsewhere to keep people honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwendy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-62972</link>
		<dc:creator>mwendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-62972</guid>
		<description>We should let the speaker police him / herself, aided further by a vibrant marketplace of ideas and information.  The fact the one might get busted by others should be enough to police the &quot;brand&quot; that is the individual blogger.  There is enough information on the web and elsewhere to keep people honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should let the speaker police him / herself, aided further by a vibrant marketplace of ideas and information.  The fact the one might get busted by others should be enough to police the &#8220;brand&#8221; that is the individual blogger.  There is enough information on the web and elsewhere to keep people honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/17/iabs-brilliant-open-letter-to-the-ftc-on-blogger-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-62966</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=22662#comment-62966</guid>
		<description>You do realize this the author of the letter you are salivating over has completely misinterpreted the guides. You can read them here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsementguidesfnnotice.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsement...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The FTC consistently refers only to advertisements where the person speaking is being paid by the vendor either in cash or in kind. I bet they would even take into account the fact that cookbook  received 13 years ago and you wrote a review of a recipe would not, in fact, count as an endorsement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look, if you get paid by a vendor to review a product, or receive it for free and intend to keep it, you should be honest about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize this the author of the letter you are salivating over has completely misinterpreted the guides. You can read them here <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsementguidesfnnotice.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsement.." rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsement..</a>.</p>
<p>The FTC consistently refers only to advertisements where the person speaking is being paid by the vendor either in cash or in kind. I bet they would even take into account the fact that cookbook  received 13 years ago and you wrote a review of a recipe would not, in fact, count as an endorsement.</p>
<p>Look, if you get paid by a vendor to review a product, or receive it for free and intend to keep it, you should be honest about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
