
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Apple&#8217;s iPhone the End of Innovation? Hahn &amp; Singer on Handset Exclusivity Fears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the iPhone the Next&#8230; Pointcast? &#171; The Enterprise Blog</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/comment-page-1/#comment-67442</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the iPhone the Next&#8230; Pointcast? &#171; The Enterprise Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=21803#comment-67442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Thierer alerts me to this new paper by Bob Hahn and Hal Singer in which they argue: Because of the overwhelming, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thierer alerts me to this new paper by Bob Hahn and Hal Singer in which they argue: Because of the overwhelming, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/comment-page-1/#comment-65055</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=21803#comment-65055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In reading the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090929/0406186352.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechDirt&lt;/a&gt; article on this post, I realized how logically flawed this article is. While it is certainly true that the &quot;hot&quot;  iPhone will eventually be replaced by a new innovative product; it does not logically follow that handset regulation or device neutrality is an inappropriate &lt;i&gt;&quot;solution&quot;&lt;/i&gt; to this supposed non-problem.  In the logical extreme, this is equivalent to saying that we all die, therefore we do not need an FDA to protect the quality of our food.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The iPhone may be marvelous and innovative, but what good is innovation if companies are allowed to arbitrarily and captiously deny you the right to the full economic use of your device? See the TechDirt post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091001/1916386401.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Speakeasy The Latest VoIP Provider To Block Certain Calls&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090929/0406186352.shtml" rel="nofollow">TechDirt</a> article on this post, I realized how logically flawed this article is. While it is certainly true that the &#8220;hot&#8221;  iPhone will eventually be replaced by a new innovative product; it does not logically follow that handset regulation or device neutrality is an inappropriate <i>&#8220;solution&#8221;</i> to this supposed non-problem.  In the logical extreme, this is equivalent to saying that we all die, therefore we do not need an FDA to protect the quality of our food.<br /><br />The iPhone may be marvelous and innovative, but what good is innovation if companies are allowed to arbitrarily and captiously deny you the right to the full economic use of your device? See the TechDirt post: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091001/1916386401.shtml" rel="nofollow">Speakeasy The Latest VoIP Provider To Block Certain Calls</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/comment-page-1/#comment-62646</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=21803#comment-62646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In reading the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090929/0406186352.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechDirt&lt;/a&gt; article on this post, I realized how logically flawed this article is. While it is certainly true that the iPhone while hot, will be eventually be replaced by a new innovative product; it does not logically follow that handset regulation or device neutrality is an inappropriate &lt;i&gt;&quot;solution&quot;&lt;/i&gt; to this supposed non-problem.  In the logical extreme, this is equivalent to saying that we all die, therefore we do not need an FDA to protect the quality of our food.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The iPhone may be marvelous and innovative, but what good is innovation if companies are allowed to arbitrarily and captiously deny you the right to the full economic use of your device? See the TechDirt post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091001/1916386401.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Speakeasy The Latest VoIP Provider To Block Certain Calls&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090929/0406186352.shtml" rel="nofollow">TechDirt</a> article on this post, I realized how logically flawed this article is. While it is certainly true that the iPhone while hot, will be eventually be replaced by a new innovative product; it does not logically follow that handset regulation or device neutrality is an inappropriate <i>&#8220;solution&#8221;</i> to this supposed non-problem.  In the logical extreme, this is equivalent to saying that we all die, therefore we do not need an FDA to protect the quality of our food.<br /><br />The iPhone may be marvelous and innovative, but what good is innovation if companies are allowed to arbitrarily and captiously deny you the right to the full economic use of your device? See the TechDirt post: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091001/1916386401.shtml" rel="nofollow">Speakeasy The Latest VoIP Provider To Block Certain Calls</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile market Wrap-up for Oct 2, 2009 &#124; Aumnia, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/09/27/is-apples-iphone-the-end-of-innovation-hahn-singer-on-handset-exclusivity-fears/comment-page-1/#comment-62642</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile market Wrap-up for Oct 2, 2009 &#124; Aumnia, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=21803#comment-62642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Devesh does, here is a list of other articles I found interesting this week: -iPhone is not the end of innovation (puts some perspective into the iPhone&#8217;s seemingly insurmountable dominance of the mobile [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Devesh does, here is a list of other articles I found interesting this week: -iPhone is not the end of innovation (puts some perspective into the iPhone&#8217;s seemingly insurmountable dominance of the mobile [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

