
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bailout For The First Amendment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re from Government and We&#8217;re Here to Help (Save Journalism)</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-67297</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re from Government and We&#8217;re Here to Help (Save Journalism)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-67297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A Bailout For The First Amendment?, by Wayne Crews, Aug. 2009 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Bailout For The First Amendment?, by Wayne Crews, Aug. 2009 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Economics is Transforming News Media; Are Universities Next? — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-61196</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Economics is Transforming News Media; Are Universities Next? — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-61196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] income tax breaks to newspaper journalists—or direct subsidies like bailouts for newspapers or expanded public funding the model of NPR. The obvious problem raised by such proposals is the old Golden Rule: &#8220;He [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] income tax breaks to newspaper journalists—or direct subsidies like bailouts for newspapers or expanded public funding the model of NPR. The obvious problem raised by such proposals is the old Golden Rule: &#8220;He [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-66009</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-66009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am fine with a privately endowed press -- but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#039;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#039;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#039;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am fine with a privately endowed press &#8212; but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#39;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#39;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#39;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-62089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-62089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am fine with a privately endowed press -- but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#039;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#039;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#039;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am fine with a privately endowed press &#8212; but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#39;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#39;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#39;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-60561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-60561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am fine with a privately endowed press -- but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#039;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#039;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#039;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am fine with a privately endowed press &#8212; but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#39;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#39;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#39;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-60560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-60560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am fine with a privately endowed press -- but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#039;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#039;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#039;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am fine with a privately endowed press &#8212; but I disagree with your latter statement that it gets little attention from those who want to save professional journalists. See Cardin&#39;s Newspaper Revitalization Act, which (as I understand it) would essentially allow media companies to reorganize into non-profit entities operating under section 501(c)(3) that could accept tax deductible private donations. The trouble with this arrangement is that 501(c)(3) entities can&#39;t endorse political candidates or take explicit stances on legislation (with limited exceptions). I&#39;m not sure how much it would hobble professional journalism were media outlets restricted in their ability to weigh in on political controversies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Brito</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/08/12/a-bailout-for-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-60543</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Brito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=20197#comment-60543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you about government funding of media, but how would you feel about a privately endowed press? I think that&#039;s an option that gets little attention from folks who seek to save &quot;professional&quot; reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you about government funding of media, but how would you feel about a privately endowed press? I think that&#39;s an option that gets little attention from folks who seek to save &#8220;professional&#8221; reporting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

