
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Cyber-Libertarianism? (The Debate over Lessig&#8217;s Code at 10 Continues)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-64707</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-64707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now, now, Adam - be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#039;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#039;d reply that&#039;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &quot;professional opponent&quot;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, Adam &#8211; be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#39;t think I&#39;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#39;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#39;d reply that&#39;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).<br /><br />I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &#8220;professional opponent&#8221;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-64706</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-64706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: <br /><br /><a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-61761</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-61761</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now, now, Adam - be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#039;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#039;d reply that&#039;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &quot;professional opponent&quot;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, Adam &#8211; be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#39;t think I&#39;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#39;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#39;d reply that&#39;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).<br /><br />I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &#8220;professional opponent&#8221;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-61760</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-61760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: <br /><br /><a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-59346</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-59346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now, now, Adam - be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#039;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#039;d reply that&#039;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &quot;professional opponent&quot;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, Adam &#8211; be fair. My view about Libertarianism are very well-known. However, in these comments, I don&#39;t think I&#39;ve said anything nasty about you as a person. There are Libertarians I think are nice people, and Libertarians I think are utter sleazes, apart from being Libertarians. I think there&#39;s a big difference between my criticizing Libertarianism, and the personal criticism of an individual (one could quibble the former entails the latter to some extent, but I&#39;d reply that&#39;s not the spirit of the charge you make above).<br /><br />I did ask if I was misreading you about being unhappy in the &#8220;professional opponent&#8221;      role, but that  was meant more as cynical political observation of the dynamics here.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/what-is-cyber-libertarianism-the-debate-over-lessigs-code-at-10-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-59345</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18281#comment-59345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:  Prof. Lessig has already responded: <br /><br /><a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence-lessig/code-and-common-causes" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/14/lawrence&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

