Comments on: Emerging Threats to Section 230 http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Zittrain’s Pessimistic Predictions and Problematic Prescriptions for the Net — Technology Liberation Front http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-62902 Zittrain’s Pessimistic Predictions and Problematic Prescriptions for the Net — Technology Liberation Front Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:56:24 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-62902 <p>[...] going to be legislating about the Internet, we need more laws like that, not those of the “middleman deputization” [...]</p> [...] going to be legislating about the Internet, we need more laws like that, not those of the “middleman deputization” [...]

]]> By: The Progress & Freedom Foundation Blog http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-62627 The Progress & Freedom Foundation Blog Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:58:02 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-62627 <p><strong> Cyberbullying Hearing Yesterday: Education, not Criminalization or Intermediary Deputization...</strong></p> <p>The House Judiciary Committee's Crime subcommittee yesterday held a hearing yesterday on the painful issues of cyberbullying (webcast). Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-CA) talked about her bill, the "Megan Meier Cyber Bullying Prevention Act" (H.R. 1966), whi...</p> Cyberbullying Hearing Yesterday: Education, not Criminalization or Intermediary Deputization…

The House Judiciary Committee’s Crime subcommittee yesterday held a hearing yesterday on the painful issues of cyberbullying (webcast). Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-CA) talked about her bill, the “Megan Meier Cyber Bullying Prevention Act” (H.R. 1966), whi…

]]> By: Cyberbullying Hearing Yesterday: Education, not Criminalization or Intermediary Deputization — Technology Liberation Front http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-62619 Cyberbullying Hearing Yesterday: Education, not Criminalization or Intermediary Deputization — Technology Liberation Front Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:41:18 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-62619 <p>[...] problems with such an approach in his Ars Technica debate with Palfrey earlier this year and has highlighted the threat this poses to online anonymity for all Internet users. The basic premise behind Section 230 remains just as [...]</p> [...] problems with such an approach in his Ars Technica debate with Palfrey earlier this year and has highlighted the threat this poses to online anonymity for all Internet users. The basic premise behind Section 230 remains just as [...]

]]> By: MikeRT http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-65735 MikeRT Fri, 15 May 2009 18:27:53 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-65735 <blockquote><br>Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.” <br></blockquote> <p><br><br>I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.</p>
Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.”



I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.

]]> By: MikeRT http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-61688 MikeRT Fri, 15 May 2009 14:27:53 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-61688 <blockquote><br>Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.” <br></blockquote> <p><br><br>I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.</p>
Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.”



I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.

]]> By: MikeRT http://techliberation.com/2009/05/14/emerging-threats-to-section-230/comment-page-1/#comment-59359 MikeRT Fri, 15 May 2009 13:27:53 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=18317#comment-59359 <blockquote><br>Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.” <br></blockquote> <p><br><br>I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.</p>
Prof. Palfrey has argued that: “The scope of the immunity the CDA provides for online service providers is too broad” and that the law “should not preclude parents from bringing a claim of negligence against [a social networking site] for failing to protect the safety of its users.”



I suppose it's too much to ask that parents be responsible for this. Parents are the ones who should be keeping their kids from meeting strangers and should also be the ones who simply pull the plug when cyberbullying starts.

]]>