
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cato Unbound Debate: Lessig’s Code at Ten (Part 2: Zittrain response)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unity Behind Diversity &#187; Unlocking An iPhone Is Not Freedom; Zittrain Argues For Civic Technologies &#187; Blaise Alleyne</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/comment-page-1/#comment-59272</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity Behind Diversity &#187; Unlocking An iPhone Is Not Freedom; Zittrain Argues For Civic Technologies &#187; Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18179#comment-59272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a middle ground between libertarianism and government regulation, arguing for civic technologies. Adam Theier has a post going up on Friday, and Lessig himself will have the last word on Monday. I highly [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a middle ground between libertarianism and government regulation, arguing for civic technologies. Adam Theier has a post going up on Friday, and Lessig himself will have the last word on Monday. I highly [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jardinero1</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/comment-page-1/#comment-65378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jardinero1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18179#comment-65378</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&quot; - exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?... especially if  &quot;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&#8221; &#8211; exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  <br /><br />How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?&#8230; especially if  &#8220;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&#8221;.  <br /><br />The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jardinero1</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/comment-page-1/#comment-61886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jardinero1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18179#comment-61886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&quot; - exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?... especially if  &quot;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&#8221; &#8211; exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  <br /><br />How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?&#8230; especially if  &#8220;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&#8221;.  <br /><br />The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jardinero1</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/05/06/cato-unbound-debate-lessig%e2%80%99s-code-at-ten-part-2-zittrain-response/comment-page-1/#comment-59270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jardinero1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=18179#comment-59270</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&quot; - exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?... especially if  &quot;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We might give way — especially if it forestalls broader interventions.&#8221; &#8211; exactly the thought of Neville Chamberlain and other losers throughout history.  <br /><br />How does capitulating to censorship, surveillance and coercion, forestall further censorship, surveillance and coercion?&#8230; especially if  &#8220;this state of freedom isn’t self-perpetuating&#8221;.  <br /><br />The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, Prof. Lessig, not a little bit of regulation just now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

