
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Major Filings in FCC&#8217;s &#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&#8221; Notice of Inquiry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC’s Genachowski Promises He’s Not Out to Regulate Net, New Media &#171; Internet Freedom Coalition</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-67062</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC’s Genachowski Promises He’s Not Out to Regulate Net, New Media &#171; Internet Freedom Coalition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-67062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] In a somewhat similar vein, Congress last year asked the agency to examine how well parental control technologies work to allow parents to filter objectionable content online. So while the FCC may have had, for once, the authority to ask broad questions, it’s startling just how broad those questions were. The Commission obviously has no authority over video games or virtual worlds, online video distribution networks or video hosting sites, mobile web content, MP3 players or iPods, P2P networks, VCRs or DVD players, PVRs or TiVo, Internet filters, safe search tools, laptops, and so on. And yet, all these things (and much more) were mentioned in the Commission’s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of Inquiry. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a somewhat similar vein, Congress last year asked the agency to examine how well parental control technologies work to allow parents to filter objectionable content online. So while the FCC may have had, for once, the authority to ask broad questions, it’s startling just how broad those questions were. The Commission obviously has no authority over video games or virtual worlds, online video distribution networks or video hosting sites, mobile web content, MP3 players or iPods, P2P networks, VCRs or DVD players, PVRs or TiVo, Internet filters, safe search tools, laptops, and so on. And yet, all these things (and much more) were mentioned in the Commission’s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of Inquiry. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filings - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-66019</link>
		<dc:creator>filings - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-66019</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] sale,distressed property,losing my home,home seizure,home repo,home repossessionMajor Filings in FCC&#039;s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of ...Major Filings in FCC&#039;s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of Inquiry ... I filed 150+ pages worth of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sale,distressed property,losing my home,home seizure,home repo,home repossessionMajor Filings in FCC&#39;s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of &#8230;Major Filings in FCC&#39;s Child Safe Viewing Act Notice of Inquiry &#8230; I filed 150+ pages worth of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the FCC Above the Law? — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-64784</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the FCC Above the Law? — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-64784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to expand or invent new authority to regulate digital media and online safety issues in its &#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&#8221; and &#8220;Empowering Parents and Protecting Children&#8221; proceedings. The agency also [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to expand or invent new authority to regulate digital media and online safety issues in its &#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&#8221; and &#8220;Empowering Parents and Protecting Children&#8221; proceedings. The agency also [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC&#8217;s New Notice on &#8220;Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape&#8221; — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-63129</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC&#8217;s New Notice on &#8220;Empowering Parents and Protecting Children in an Evolving Media Landscape&#8221; — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-63129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] bill and the FCC’s proceedings are worth monitoring. In previous posts here, I also listed all the major filings and reply comments that were submitted to the FCC in the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bill and the FCC’s proceedings are worth monitoring. In previous posts here, I also listed all the major filings and reply comments that were submitted to the FCC in the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reply Comments in FCC&#8217;s &#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&#8221; Notice of Inquiry &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-59399</link>
		<dc:creator>Reply Comments in FCC&#8217;s &#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&#8221; Notice of Inquiry &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-59399</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I mentioned in a post last month, dozens of comments were filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as part of the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mentioned in a post last month, dozens of comments were filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as part of the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/04/20/major-filings-in-fccs-child-safe-viewing-act-notice-of-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-59109</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17823#comment-59109</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mom Blogs - Blogs for Moms...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mom Blogs &#8211; Blogs for Moms&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

