<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Sec. 230 and Online Immunity: My Debate with Harvard&#8217;s John Palfrey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:15:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymity, Reader Comments &#38; Section 230 — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-62858</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymity, Reader Comments &#38; Section 230 — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-62858</guid>
		<description>[...] it goes without saying that this debate is fundamentally tied up with the future of Section 230 and the question of intermediary liability.  Currently, online service providers of all flavors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it goes without saying that this debate is fundamentally tied up with the future of Section 230 and the question of intermediary liability.  Currently, online service providers of all flavors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook, Twitter, Online Identity Integration &#38; the Future of Anonymity — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-62857</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook, Twitter, Online Identity Integration &#38; the Future of Anonymity — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-62857</guid>
		<description>[...] intermediaries under Section 230, something my PFF colleague Adam Thierer has recently discussed here and here. I hope Facebook, Twitter and others are ready for the pressure. But online middlemen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intermediaries under Section 230, something my PFF colleague Adam Thierer has recently discussed here and here. I hope Facebook, Twitter and others are ready for the pressure. But online middlemen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guidelines &#38; Best Practices for Anonymous Blogging (Pt.2)</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-61008</link>
		<dc:creator>Guidelines &#38; Best Practices for Anonymous Blogging (Pt.2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-61008</guid>
		<description>[...] online operators from onerous forms of liability for the content they host on their sites, although some would like to change that. Also, as I&#8217;ve discussed here before, some critics of online anonymity would like to see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online operators from onerous forms of liability for the content they host on their sites, although some would like to change that. Also, as I&#8217;ve discussed here before, some critics of online anonymity would like to see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami SEO</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-61726</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-61726</guid>
		<description>wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami SEO</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-59406</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-59406</guid>
		<description>wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Section 230 and Internet Intermediaries</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-58599</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Section 230 and Internet Intermediaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-58599</guid>
		<description>[...] has posted my debate with Adam Thierer, the eloquent director of the Progress and Freedom Foundation&#8217;s Center for Digital Media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has posted my debate with Adam Thierer, the eloquent director of the Progress and Freedom Foundation&#8217;s Center for Digital Media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
