
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Sec. 230 and Online Immunity: My Debate with Harvard&#8217;s John Palfrey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 22:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Try as They May, Plaintiffs Can’t Get Around CDA §230 Safe Harbor &#171;</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-74873</link>
		<dc:creator>Try as They May, Plaintiffs Can’t Get Around CDA §230 Safe Harbor &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-74873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] host.  Not surprisingly the broad immunity granted to websites by §230 is controversial and has proponents on the both sides of the immunity spectrum.  One thing is clear though, plaintiffs will continue to try and beat the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] host.  Not surprisingly the broad immunity granted to websites by §230 is controversial and has proponents on the both sides of the immunity spectrum.  One thing is clear though, plaintiffs will continue to try and beat the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why SOPA Threatens the DMCA Safe Harbor</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-74813</link>
		<dc:creator>Why SOPA Threatens the DMCA Safe Harbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-74813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of utopias,&#8221; as my colleagues have explained time and time again on these pages (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The unintended consequences of overbroad, carelessly drafted legislation in this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of utopias,&#8221; as my colleagues have explained time and time again on these pages (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The unintended consequences of overbroad, carelessly drafted legislation in this [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymity, Reader Comments &#38; Section 230 — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-62858</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymity, Reader Comments &#38; Section 230 — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-62858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] it goes without saying that this debate is fundamentally tied up with the future of Section 230 and the question of intermediary liability.  Currently, online service providers of all flavors [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it goes without saying that this debate is fundamentally tied up with the future of Section 230 and the question of intermediary liability.  Currently, online service providers of all flavors [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook, Twitter, Online Identity Integration &#38; the Future of Anonymity — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-62857</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook, Twitter, Online Identity Integration &#38; the Future of Anonymity — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-62857</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] intermediaries under Section 230, something my PFF colleague Adam Thierer has recently discussed here and here. I hope Facebook, Twitter and others are ready for the pressure. But online middlemen [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intermediaries under Section 230, something my PFF colleague Adam Thierer has recently discussed here and here. I hope Facebook, Twitter and others are ready for the pressure. But online middlemen [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guidelines &#38; Best Practices for Anonymous Blogging (Pt.2)</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-61008</link>
		<dc:creator>Guidelines &#38; Best Practices for Anonymous Blogging (Pt.2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-61008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] online operators from onerous forms of liability for the content they host on their sites, although some would like to change that. Also, as I&#8217;ve discussed here before, some critics of online anonymity would like to see [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online operators from onerous forms of liability for the content they host on their sites, although some would like to change that. Also, as I&#8217;ve discussed here before, some critics of online anonymity would like to see [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami SEO</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-61726</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-61726</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;wow&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami SEO</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-59406</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-59406</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;wow&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Section 230 and Internet Intermediaries</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/03/06/the-future-of-sec-230-and-online-immunity-my-debate-with-harvards-john-palfrey/comment-page-1/#comment-58599</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Section 230 and Internet Intermediaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=17288#comment-58599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has posted my debate with Adam Thierer, the eloquent director of the Progress and Freedom Foundation&#8217;s Center for Digital Media [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has posted my debate with Adam Thierer, the eloquent director of the Progress and Freedom Foundation&#8217;s Center for Digital Media [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

