
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Simple Privacy Policies, Free Internet Services, and &#8220;Adequate Notice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Targeted Online Advertising: What’s the Harm &#38; Where Are We Heading? &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-58102</link>
		<dc:creator>Targeted Online Advertising: What’s the Harm &#38; Where Are We Heading? &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-58102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Adam Thierer and I have just released a new PFF paper entitled &#8220;Targeted Online Advertising: What&#8217;s the Harm &amp; Where Are We Heading?&#8221; (PDF) about the FTC&#8217;s new “Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising.&#8221;  Adam lampooned some of the attitudes at play in this debate in a great rant yesterday. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adam Thierer and I have just released a new PFF paper entitled &#8220;Targeted Online Advertising: What&#8217;s the Harm &amp; Where Are We Heading?&#8221; (PDF) about the FTC&#8217;s new “Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising.&#8221;  Adam lampooned some of the attitudes at play in this debate in a great rant yesterday. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-65486</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-65486</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn&#039;t sound like &quot;standardizing privacy policies,&quot; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#39;t sound like &#8220;standardizing privacy policies,&#8221; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-65485</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-65485</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why shouldn&#039;t we standardize privacy policies?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:<br /><br />Why shouldn&#39;t we standardize privacy policies?<br /><br />Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-61763</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-61763</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn&#039;t sound like &quot;standardizing privacy policies,&quot; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#39;t sound like &#8220;standardizing privacy policies,&#8221; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-61762</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-61762</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why shouldn&#039;t we standardize privacy policies?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:<br /><br />Why shouldn&#39;t we standardize privacy policies?<br /><br />Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thierer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-58081</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thierer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-58081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn&#039;t sound like &quot;standardizing privacy policies,&quot; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#39;t sound like &#8220;standardizing privacy policies,&#8221; that just sounds like providing more information about policies, which I think is great.  I want robust competition between companies in term of privacy policies, not just a Washington-approved, one-size-fits-all model.  Transparency is fine. Micromanaging business models is not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2009/02/12/on-simple-privacy-policies-free-internet-services-and-adequate-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-58080</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=16608#comment-58080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why shouldn&#039;t we standardize privacy policies?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That is quite a tirade.  Clearly, you are addressing some of the more extreme privacy advocates who want to ban or manipulate online business models.  Among moderates, however, I think there is a very legitimate debate surrounding the self-regulatory approach:<br /><br />Why shouldn&#39;t we standardize privacy policies?<br /><br />Above the pages and pages of legal language, you could have a simple table that companies would be required to fill in to the best of their ability.  This would be similar to standardizing food labels in the grocery store.  Personally, I find it very helpful that I can pick up two products and immediately compare their nutritional facts.  This makes me a more informed consumer before I decide to purchase.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

