Comments on: Google’s Lopsided Trademark Policy http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sun, 27 May 2012 20:03:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: jim harper - StartTags.com http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-66008 jim harper - StartTags.com Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:42:45 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-66008 <p>[...] Jerry Brito. Jim Harper. Julian Sanchez. PJ Doland. Ryan Radia. Solveig Singleton. Sonia Arrison ...Google's Lopsided Trademark Policy Technology Liberation FrontKeeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to ... Google's Lopsided [...]</p> [...] Jerry Brito. Jim Harper. Julian Sanchez. PJ Doland. Ryan Radia. Solveig Singleton. Sonia Arrison …Google's Lopsided Trademark Policy Technology Liberation FrontKeeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to … Google's Lopsided [...]

]]> By: Don Marti http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-65392 Don Marti Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:58:03 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-65392 <ol> <li>Install CustomizeGoogle. <a href="http://www.customizegoogle.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.customizegoogle.com/</a><br>2. From the Tools menu, select "CustomizeGoogle Options." Check "Remove ads."</li> </ol>
  • Install CustomizeGoogle. http://www.customizegoogle.com/
    2. From the Tools menu, select “CustomizeGoogle Options.” Check “Remove ads.”
    • ]]>         By: DB http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-65391 DB Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:01:46 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-65391 <p>And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.<br><br>Tim Wu's argument is fun--you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).</p> And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.

    Tim Wu's argument is fun–you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).

    ]]>         By: JohnMcDonald http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-65390 JohnMcDonald Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:37:39 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-65390 <p>Google isn't even that picky about their trademark claims. I started an Adwords campaign of my own a few weeks ago and it got shot down because a claim was made protecting the phrase "Promo Code." <br><br>I'm not sure Google knows who claims to own "Promo code" but they simply don't seem to care. Neither would I expect them to have any incentive to change their business unless we actually take our money and searches elsewhere.</p> Google isn't even that picky about their trademark claims. I started an Adwords campaign of my own a few weeks ago and it got shot down because a claim was made protecting the phrase “Promo Code.”

    I'm not sure Google knows who claims to own “Promo code” but they simply don't seem to care. Neither would I expect them to have any incentive to change their business unless we actually take our money and searches elsewhere.

    ]]>         By: Don Marti http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-61933 Don Marti Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:58:03 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-61933 <ol> <li>Install CustomizeGoogle. <a href="http://www.customizegoogle.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.customizegoogle.com/</a><br>2. From the Tools menu, select "CustomizeGoogle Options." Check "Remove ads."</li> </ol>
  • Install CustomizeGoogle. http://www.customizegoogle.com/
    2. From the Tools menu, select “CustomizeGoogle Options.” Check “Remove ads.”
    • ]]>         By: DB http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-61932 DB Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:01:46 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-61932 <p>And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.<br><br>Tim Wu's argument is fun--you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).</p> And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.

    Tim Wu's argument is fun–you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).

    ]]>         By: Don Marti http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-57145 Don Marti Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:58:03 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-57145 <ol> <li>Install CustomizeGoogle. <a href="http://www.customizegoogle.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.customizegoogle.com/</a><br>2. From the Tools menu, select "CustomizeGoogle Options." Check "Remove ads."</li> </ol>
  • Install CustomizeGoogle. http://www.customizegoogle.com/
    2. From the Tools menu, select “CustomizeGoogle Options.” Check “Remove ads.”
    • ]]>         By: DB http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-57141 DB Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:01:46 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-57141 <p>And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.<br><br>Tim Wu's argument is fun--you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).</p> And we can't do that, thanks to the search and advertising oligopoly.

    Tim Wu's argument is fun–you can apply it to anything (see Tim Lee's post above).

    ]]>         By: JohnMcDonald http://techliberation.com/2008/12/18/googles-lopsided-trademark-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-57140 JohnMcDonald Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:37:39 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=15008#comment-57140 <p>Google isn't even that picky about their trademark claims. I started an Adwords campaign of my own a few weeks ago and it got shot down because a claim was made protecting the phrase "Promo Code." <br><br>I'm not sure Google knows who claims to own "Promo code" but they simply don't seem to care. Neither would I expect them to have any incentive to change their business unless we actually take our money and searches elsewhere.</p> Google isn't even that picky about their trademark claims. I started an Adwords campaign of my own a few weeks ago and it got shot down because a claim was made protecting the phrase “Promo Code.”

    I'm not sure Google knows who claims to own “Promo code” but they simply don't seem to care. Neither would I expect them to have any incentive to change their business unless we actually take our money and searches elsewhere.

    ]]>