
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut Towns: Arm hurt? Cut it off!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/12/07/conn-towns-arm-hurt-cut-it-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/07/conn-towns-arm-hurt-cut-it-off/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/07/conn-towns-arm-hurt-cut-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-69050</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=14782#comment-69050</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 - $40,000 per meeting, I&#039;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#039;t like cheap, plain and simple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 &#8211; $40,000 per meeting, I&#39;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#39;t like cheap, plain and simple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/07/conn-towns-arm-hurt-cut-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-61995</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=14782#comment-61995</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 - $40,000 per meeting, I&#039;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#039;t like cheap, plain and simple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 &#8211; $40,000 per meeting, I&#39;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#39;t like cheap, plain and simple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/07/conn-towns-arm-hurt-cut-it-off/comment-page-1/#comment-56940</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=14782#comment-56940</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 - $40,000 per meeting, I&#039;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#039;t like cheap, plain and simple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, i think that is a TERRIFIC idea!  Although.. that is much too efficient and cheap for any government organization to adopt.  If we can find them a way to do it for $30,000 &#8211; $40,000 per meeting, I&#39;m sure they would be more open to that than a nearly free solution.  Government doesn&#39;t like cheap, plain and simple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

