Comments on: “Child Safe Viewing Act” (S. 602) signed by President Bush

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:38:52 +0000

I wish you like ugg boots,ugg boots 2009

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:37:03 +0000

do you like ugg boots?

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:38:52 +0000

I wish you like ugg boots,ugg boots 2009

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:37:03 +0000

do you like ugg boots?

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:36:35 +0000

do you like ugg boots?ugg boots 2009

By: uggworld

uggworld — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:35:23 +0000

what are the uggs? ugg uk
do you like ugg boots?

By: Comments in FCC “Child Safe Viewing Act” Proceeding | The Technology Liberation Front

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:49:38 +0000

[...] under the “Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007,” which Congress passed last year and President Bush signed last December. The goal of the bill and the FCC’s proceeding (MB 09-26) is to study “advanced [...]

By: Dawn of Convergence-Era Content Regulation at the FCC? “Child Safe Viewing Act” NOI Launched | The Technology Liberation Front

Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:15:45 +0000

[...] by S. 602, the “Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007,” which Congress passed last October and President Bush signed into law on December 2nd. The measure requires the FCC to examine: (1) the existence and availability of [...]

By: Angela Poole

Angela Poole — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:58:49 +0000

290780

By: Nancy Brockington

Nancy Brockington — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:26:48 +0000

ur blog is awsome men

By: for you health

for you health — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:52:16 +0000

nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now
keep it up

By: mestinon

mestinon — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:19:12 +0000

Thank you very much.

By: nutrition foods

nutrition foods — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:09:06 +0000

Thanks for the info. May God have mercy on us all.

By: Ars on “Better FCC Indecency Complaints” - The Technology Liberation Front

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:44:23 +0000

[...] Of course, these hecklers could just turn off those devices or use parental control tools and stratgies to deal with what their kids see and hear. Instead, those folks want to impose their will on ALL of us. Worse yet, they now are expanding their mission to include the Internet. Thankfully, we don’t have a Federal Computer Commission fielding bogus complaints about the Net. At least not yet. [...]

By: acedebase

acedebase — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:28:12 +0000

Sounds like censorship wrapped up in a cloak of fear mongering – business as usual on Capitol Hill.

By: CLOWN PENIS FARTER

CLOWN PENIS FARTER — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:59:32 +0000

SUPER FAG.

MOVE TO ASIA YOU FUCKIN HIPPIE.

By: CLOWN PENIS FARTER

CLOWN PENIS FARTER — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:58:59 +0000

FAG

By: Adam Thierer

Adam Thierer — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:59:22 +0000

Explain to me how using the copyright code to limit the term of “violent” or “indecent” material to 2 years isn't just another form of government censorship. It would be a blatant First Amendment violation.

By: Don Marti

Don Marti — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:29:30 +0000

Congress isn't using all the clubs in its bag when it comes to child-safe content. Just cut the copyright term for violent and/or indencent material to two years. Plenty of time for a hot game, or a movie's theatrical and DVD release, but short enough that it would tend to drive investment to more productive material.