<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loud TV Ads: No Need for Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:01:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Congresswoman, CALM Thyself! LA Times Eschews Eshoo Nanny State Bill to Regulate Ad Volume — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-64117</link>
		<dc:creator>Congresswoman, CALM Thyself! LA Times Eschews Eshoo Nanny State Bill to Regulate Ad Volume — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-64117</guid>
		<description>[...] (CALM) Act,  passed by the House on Tuesday.   As Adam  Thierer and I have discussed (here, here, and here), this silly paternalist law would require the FCC to issue rules that broadcast and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (CALM) Act,  passed by the House on Tuesday.   As Adam  Thierer and I have discussed (here, here, and here), this silly paternalist law would require the FCC to issue rules that broadcast and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front &#124; Wood TV Stand</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-59487</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front &#124; Wood TV Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-59487</guid>
		<description>[...] Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (http://techliberation.com)        Loud tv ads no need for regulation your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator powered by wordpress 2 7 1 styled by bogart 0 8        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (<a href="http://techliberation.com" rel="nofollow">http://techliberation.com</a>)        Loud tv ads no need for regulation your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator powered by wordpress 2 7 1 styled by bogart 0 8        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Loud TV Ads No Need for Regulation The Technology Liberation Front [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteyRamone77</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-65365</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteyRamone77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-65365</guid>
		<description>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;      I realize it&#039;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#039;s like someone yelling at you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#039;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Petey Ramone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.</p>
<p>      I realize it&#39;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.</p>
<p>     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#39;s like someone yelling at you.</p>
<p>     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#39;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.</p>
<p>     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.</p>
<p>     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.</p>
<p>     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.</p>
<p>     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.</p>
<p>     Petey Ramone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteyRamone77</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-61855</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteyRamone77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-61855</guid>
		<description>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;      I realize it&#039;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#039;s like someone yelling at you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#039;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Petey Ramone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.</p>
<p>      I realize it&#39;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.</p>
<p>     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#39;s like someone yelling at you.</p>
<p>     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#39;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.</p>
<p>     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.</p>
<p>     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.</p>
<p>     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.</p>
<p>     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.</p>
<p>     Petey Ramone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteyRamone77</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-58669</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteyRamone77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-58669</guid>
		<description>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;      I realize it&#039;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#039;s like someone yelling at you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#039;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;     Petey Ramone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has been annoyed by this practice for almost 40 years, I applaud the lawmakers who are taking a stand on this.</p>
<p>      I realize it&#39;s not up there with bringing the corporations back down to earth or stopping illegal immigration, but to anyone who watches TV more than a few minutes a day and particularly after 9:00 PM or so, I feel this is an important step.</p>
<p>     Our local cable company, as if regular ads are often loud enough, has their own ads for their different services that run all the time and they are even louder than standard ad volumes, to the point where it&#39;s like someone yelling at you.</p>
<p>     I cannot count the times I have grabbed the remote as quickly as I can, not only to ease the assault on my hearing, but also so others in the house will not be awakened..  It&#39;s the difference between  say a Mustang driving by and a fire truck with siren blaring.</p>
<p>     Being in radio, I understand your sound quality concerns; my pet peeve is compressed sound on some movies on television.</p>
<p>     But given the choice, I will take not having to grab the remote and crank it down, then back up four minutes later, every hour ad nauseum.</p>
<p>     I actually watch through the ads, because I know if not for them, it would cost a lot more to get the programs and I appreciate them paying for much of the cost and feel to respect that, I can at least hear what they have to say.</p>
<p>     But the volume boosting done by technical people is just way out of line.</p>
<p>     Petey Ramone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-56663</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-56663</guid>
		<description>Well, it has been solved technologically but unfortunately the cable/broadcasting industry sends in the wrong values anyway so you either have cable-company inserted loud ads or inconsistent volumes between channels depending on your equipment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for cable boxes, I was recently in Office Depot and noticed how they have a few PCs as small as mine!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But not everyone hates cable.  My cable box draws right around 40W, whether on or off so while they shrink (and the cat grows), they keep the warmth that makes them so well loved, and now 24 hours a day, not at TV time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it has been solved technologically but unfortunately the cable/broadcasting industry sends in the wrong values anyway so you either have cable-company inserted loud ads or inconsistent volumes between channels depending on your equipment.  </p>
<p>As for cable boxes, I was recently in Office Depot and noticed how they have a few PCs as small as mine!  </p>
<p>But not everyone hates cable.  My cable box draws right around 40W, whether on or off so while they shrink (and the cat grows), they keep the warmth that makes them so well loved, and now 24 hours a day, not at TV time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cordblomquist</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/21/loud-tv-ads-no-need-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-56411</link>
		<dc:creator>cordblomquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=13395#comment-56411</guid>
		<description>This has been solved technologically by many devices.  Volume regulation is a regular feature on many televisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, I now have regular cable TV, so now I&#039;ll understand these comments about the television.  My new cable box is the size of a paperback book.  I remember when those things looked like small PCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been solved technologically by many devices.  Volume regulation is a regular feature on many televisions.</p>
<p>Oh, I now have regular cable TV, so now I&#39;ll understand these comments about the television.  My new cable box is the size of a paperback book.  I remember when those things looked like small PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
