
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Public Interest Standard Really a Standard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 10 Most Important Info-Tech Policy Books of 2009 — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-64190</link>
		<dc:creator>The 10 Most Important Info-Tech Policy Books of 2009 — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=12308#comment-64190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] all sorts of talk about &#8220;regulation in the public interest,&#8221; which I have critique as a meaningless non-standard here many times [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all sorts of talk about &#8220;regulation in the public interest,&#8221; which I have critique as a meaningless non-standard here many times [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the FCC&#8217;s e-Government Transparency Efforts: ECFS, RSS, Social Media &#38; Setting Priorities — Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61421</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the FCC&#8217;s e-Government Transparency Efforts: ECFS, RSS, Social Media &#38; Setting Priorities — Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=12308#comment-61421</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] thrilled about the RSS feeds, which go a long way in letting all Americans know what the FCC does, supposedly in the &#8220;public interest.&#8221; Still, I can&#8217;t help but note that the FCC waited until after a huge discussion about whether [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thrilled about the RSS feeds, which go a long way in letting all Americans know what the FCC does, supposedly in the &#8220;public interest.&#8221; Still, I can&#8217;t help but note that the FCC waited until after a huge discussion about whether [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjschultze</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-65259</link>
		<dc:creator>sjschultze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=12308#comment-65259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Adam.  I too look forward to ongoing debate.  I agree that &quot;the public interest&quot; has long been twisted to suit the interests of politicos (and incumbent industries).  Broadcast regulation has been particularly troubling in this respect.  Where it appears that we differ is over whether we should try to better define it or abandon it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adam.  I too look forward to ongoing debate.  I agree that &#8220;the public interest&#8221; has long been twisted to suit the interests of politicos (and incumbent industries).  Broadcast regulation has been particularly troubling in this respect.  Where it appears that we differ is over whether we should try to better define it or abandon it altogether.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjschultze</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/28/is-the-public-interest-standard-really-a-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-56027</link>
		<dc:creator>sjschultze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=12308#comment-56027</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Adam.  I too look forward to ongoing debate.  I agree that &quot;the public interest&quot; has long been twisted to suit the interests of politicos (and incumbent industries).  Broadcast regulation has been particularly troubling in this respect.  Where it appears that we differ is over whether we should try to better define it or abandon it altogether.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adam.  I too look forward to ongoing debate.  I agree that &#8220;the public interest&#8221; has long been twisted to suit the interests of politicos (and incumbent industries).  Broadcast regulation has been particularly troubling in this respect.  Where it appears that we differ is over whether we should try to better define it or abandon it altogether.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

