
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Boon for Copyright&#8217;s Biggest Holders?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carme</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-65866</link>
		<dc:creator>Carme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11964#comment-65866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As the CAFC judges write in the opinion, the purpose of copyright is to preserve the monetary value of protected works. Once someone buys a book or a song, he doesn&#039;t need a license to use them in a way allowed by copyright law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The opinion states that if a license offers additional freedoms beyond those allowed by copyright then breaching the license takes away those freedoms and the rules revert to those of copyright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A license that tries to take away freedoms allowed by copyright law was not considered, but it if is treated in the same way then once it&#039;s breached the normal rules of copyright would apply, which makes the license moot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the CAFC judges write in the opinion, the purpose of copyright is to preserve the monetary value of protected works. Once someone buys a book or a song, he doesn&#39;t need a license to use them in a way allowed by copyright law.<br /><br />The opinion states that if a license offers additional freedoms beyond those allowed by copyright then breaching the license takes away those freedoms and the rules revert to those of copyright.<br /><br />A license that tries to take away freedoms allowed by copyright law was not considered, but it if is treated in the same way then once it&#39;s breached the normal rules of copyright would apply, which makes the license moot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carme</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-54355</link>
		<dc:creator>Carme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11964#comment-54355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As the CAFC judges write in the opinion, the purpose of copyright is to preserve the monetary value of protected works. Once someone buys a book or a song, he doesn&#039;t need a license to use them in a way allowed by copyright law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The opinion states that if a license offers additional freedoms beyond those allowed by copyright then breaching the license takes away those freedoms and the rules revert to those of copyright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A license that tries to take away freedoms allowed by copyright law was not considered, but it if is treated in the same way then once it&#039;s breached the normal rules of copyright would apply, which makes the license moot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the CAFC judges write in the opinion, the purpose of copyright is to preserve the monetary value of protected works. Once someone buys a book or a song, he doesn&#8217;t need a license to use them in a way allowed by copyright law.<br /><br />The opinion states that if a license offers additional freedoms beyond those allowed by copyright then breaching the license takes away those freedoms and the rules revert to those of copyright.<br /><br />A license that tries to take away freedoms allowed by copyright law was not considered, but it if is treated in the same way then once it&#8217;s breached the normal rules of copyright would apply, which makes the license moot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Clements</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-51723</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Clements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11964#comment-51723</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the main import is not necessarily what is allowed or disallowed by copyright holders, but what remedies are available for breach.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main import is not necessarily what is allowed or disallowed by copyright holders, but what remedies are available for breach.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binarybits</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/14/a-boon-for-copyrights-biggest-holders/comment-page-1/#comment-48123</link>
		<dc:creator>binarybits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11964#comment-48123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When do non-free song or software vendors ever allow consumers to make and distribute copies of their products?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do non-free song or software vendors ever allow consumers to make and distribute copies of their products?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

