<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Lawsuit Against YouTube Still Useless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:45:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timon Weller</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-65028</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-65028</guid>
		<description>Google may regret buying youtube now... however i think google will win the case with a solution that will be implemented on youtube to check for such things in future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may regret buying youtube now&#8230; however i think google will win the case with a solution that will be implemented on youtube to check for such things in future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon Weller</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-56284</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-56284</guid>
		<description>Google may regret buying youtube now... however i think google will win the case with a solution that will be implemented on youtube to check for such things in future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may regret buying youtube now&#8230; however i think google will win the case with a solution that will be implemented on youtube to check for such things in future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cayce Pollard</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-49332</link>
		<dc:creator>Cayce Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-49332</guid>
		<description>&quot;but they HAD to know what was getting put up&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know for SURE that the guys at AT&amp;T know that people are setting up drug deals on the phone.  And I&#039;m pretty sure that the guys at Smith &amp; Wesson know that guns are used to shoot people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but they HAD to know what was getting put up&#8221;</p>
<p>I know for SURE that the guys at AT&amp;T know that people are setting up drug deals on the phone.  And I&#8217;m pretty sure that the guys at Smith &amp; Wesson know that guns are used to shoot people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cayce Pollard</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-42796</link>
		<dc:creator>Cayce Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-42796</guid>
		<description>&quot;but they HAD to know what was getting put up&quot;

I know for SURE that the guys at AT&amp;T know that people are setting up drug deals on the phone.  And I&#039;m pretty sure that the guys at Smith &amp; Wesson know that guns are used to shoot people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but they HAD to know what was getting put up&#8221;</p>
<p>I know for SURE that the guys at AT&amp;T know that people are setting up drug deals on the phone.  And I&#8217;m pretty sure that the guys at Smith &amp; Wesson know that guns are used to shoot people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smokey</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-49331</link>
		<dc:creator>smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-49331</guid>
		<description>The point raised by Ryan is an important one, that may not have gotten the attention it deserves.  Based on what I&#039;ve read about the early days of YouTube, and based on my own experiences working at an online video startup, I am absolutely sure that YouTube employees broke the DMCA.  They may not have actually uploaded material themselves, although that would not surprise me, but they HAD to know what was getting put up.  It just beggars the imagination to think they were blind to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point raised by Ryan is an important one, that may not have gotten the attention it deserves.  Based on what I&#8217;ve read about the early days of YouTube, and based on my own experiences working at an online video startup, I am absolutely sure that YouTube employees broke the DMCA.  They may not have actually uploaded material themselves, although that would not surprise me, but they HAD to know what was getting put up.  It just beggars the imagination to think they were blind to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smokey</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-42779</link>
		<dc:creator>smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-42779</guid>
		<description>The point raised by Ryan is an important one, that may not have gotten the attention it deserves.  Based on what I&#039;ve read about the early days of YouTube, and based on my own experiences working at an online video startup, I am absolutely sure that YouTube employees broke the DMCA.  They may not have actually uploaded material themselves, although that would not surprise me, but they HAD to know what was getting put up.  It just beggars the imagination to think they were blind to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point raised by Ryan is an important one, that may not have gotten the attention it deserves.  Based on what I&#8217;ve read about the early days of YouTube, and based on my own experiences working at an online video startup, I am absolutely sure that YouTube employees broke the DMCA.  They may not have actually uploaded material themselves, although that would not surprise me, but they HAD to know what was getting put up.  It just beggars the imagination to think they were blind to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-49330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-49330</guid>
		<description>The latest wrinkle is that Viacom wants to know if any Google employees have uploaded infringing files to YouTube. Naturally, Google has resisted, citing employee privacy. But the DMCA&#039;s Safe Harbor specifically excludes service providers with actual knowledge of the circumstances surrounding copyright infringement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Google has been knowingly facilitating copyright infringement, then it&#039;s possible that YouTube might lose its Safe Harbor defense and end up on the hook for civil penalties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest wrinkle is that Viacom wants to know if any Google employees have uploaded infringing files to YouTube. Naturally, Google has resisted, citing employee privacy. But the DMCA&#8217;s Safe Harbor specifically excludes service providers with actual knowledge of the circumstances surrounding copyright infringement. </p>
<p>If Google has been knowingly facilitating copyright infringement, then it&#8217;s possible that YouTube might lose its Safe Harbor defense and end up on the hook for civil penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Radia</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/21/viacom-lawsuit-against-youtube-still-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-42776</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Radia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11240#comment-42776</guid>
		<description>The latest wrinkle is that Viacom wants to know if any Google employees have uploaded infringing files to YouTube. Naturally, Google has resisted, citing employee privacy. But the DMCA&#039;s Safe Harbor specifically excludes service providers with actual knowledge of the circumstances surrounding copyright infringement. 

If Google has been knowingly facilitating copyright infringement, then it&#039;s possible that YouTube might lose its Safe Harbor defense and end up on the hook for civil penalties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest wrinkle is that Viacom wants to know if any Google employees have uploaded infringing files to YouTube. Naturally, Google has resisted, citing employee privacy. But the DMCA&#8217;s Safe Harbor specifically excludes service providers with actual knowledge of the circumstances surrounding copyright infringement. </p>
<p>If Google has been knowingly facilitating copyright infringement, then it&#8217;s possible that YouTube might lose its Safe Harbor defense and end up on the hook for civil penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
