Comments on: The medium is not the message http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sun, 27 May 2012 12:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jim Meyer http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-48735 Jim Meyer Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:44:36 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-48735 <p>There are no rules which restrict Congress's use of social media websites. Three important facts in this discussion:<br><br>1. The current CHA rules only limit content which is included on, or linked to from, a member's official House.gov website.<br><br>2. House members have (reasonably) complained that they are unable to post video to their House.gov website under these restrictions.<br><br>3. Rep. Capuano proposed designating official channels in which videos could be posted, then embedded and/or linked to from House.gov sites.<br><br>The only prohibition is regarding linking content from those sites into a members' official House.gov sites in order to prevent members from using the public resources and monies given to them for private purposes (e.g. campaigning), as well as to prevent them from appearing to officially endorse a particular product or service on behalf of Congress.<br><br>These are, imho, worthy aims.<br><br>For more information, you should read:<br><br>House CHA rules online:<br> <a href="http://gop.cha.house.gov/services/membershandbook.shtml">http://gop.cha.house.gov/services/membershandbo...</a><br><br>My two posts on this topic, which provide much greater detail and further reference:<br> <a href="http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congres.html">http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr...</a><br> <a href="http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr-1.html">http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr...</a></p> There are no rules which restrict Congress’s use of social media websites. Three important facts in this discussion:

1. The current CHA rules only limit content which is included on, or linked to from, a member’s official House.gov website.

2. House members have (reasonably) complained that they are unable to post video to their House.gov website under these restrictions.

3. Rep. Capuano proposed designating official channels in which videos could be posted, then embedded and/or linked to from House.gov sites.

The only prohibition is regarding linking content from those sites into a members’ official House.gov sites in order to prevent members from using the public resources and monies given to them for private purposes (e.g. campaigning), as well as to prevent them from appearing to officially endorse a particular product or service on behalf of Congress.

These are, imho, worthy aims.

For more information, you should read:

House CHA rules online:
http://gop.cha.house.gov/services/membershandbo…

My two posts on this topic, which provide much greater detail and further reference:
http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr…
http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr…

]]> By: Jim Meyer http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-43208 Jim Meyer Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:44:36 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-43208 <p>There are no rules which restrict Congress's use of social media websites. Three important facts in this discussion:</p> <ol> <li><p>The current CHA rules only limit content which is included on, or linked to from, a member's official House.gov website.</p></li> <li><p>House members have (reasonably) complained that they are unable to post video to their House.gov website under these restrictions.</p></li> <li><p>Rep. Capuano proposed designating official channels in which videos could be posted, then embedded and/or linked to from House.gov sites.</p></li> </ol> <p>The only prohibition is regarding linking content from those sites into a members' official House.gov sites in order to prevent members from using the public resources and monies given to them for private purposes (e.g. campaigning), as well as to prevent them from appearing to officially endorse a particular product or service on behalf of Congress.</p> <p>These are, imho, worthy aims.</p> <p>For more information, you should read:</p> <p>House CHA rules online: http://gop.cha.house.gov/services/membershandbook.shtml</p> <p>My two posts on this topic, which provide much greater detail and further reference: http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congres.html http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr-1.html</p> There are no rules which restrict Congress’s use of social media websites. Three important facts in this discussion:

  1. The current CHA rules only limit content which is included on, or linked to from, a member’s official House.gov website.

  2. House members have (reasonably) complained that they are unable to post video to their House.gov website under these restrictions.

  3. Rep. Capuano proposed designating official channels in which videos could be posted, then embedded and/or linked to from House.gov sites.

The only prohibition is regarding linking content from those sites into a members’ official House.gov sites in order to prevent members from using the public resources and monies given to them for private purposes (e.g. campaigning), as well as to prevent them from appearing to officially endorse a particular product or service on behalf of Congress.

These are, imho, worthy aims.

For more information, you should read:

House CHA rules online: http://gop.cha.house.gov/services/membershandbook.shtml

My two posts on this topic, which provide much greater detail and further reference: http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congres.html http://blog.geekdaily.org/2008/07/let-our-congr-1.html

]]> By: 9/11 http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-48734 9/11 Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:03:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-48734 <p>Maturity begins when we're content to feel we're right about something without feeling the necessity to prove someone else is wrong.SydneyJ.HarrisSydney J. Harris, Syndicated columnist, 1917-1986</p> Maturity begins when we’re content to feel we’re right about something without feeling the necessity to prove someone else is wrong.SydneyJ.HarrisSydney J. Harris, Syndicated columnist, 1917-1986

]]> By: 9/11 http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-42850 9/11 Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:03:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-42850 <p>Maturity begins when we're content to feel we're right about something without feeling the necessity to prove someone else is wrong.SydneyJ.HarrisSydney J. Harris, Syndicated columnist, 1917-1986</p> Maturity begins when we’re content to feel we’re right about something without feeling the necessity to prove someone else is wrong.SydneyJ.HarrisSydney J. Harris, Syndicated columnist, 1917-1986

]]> By: Joseph http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-48733 Joseph Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:59:42 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-48733 <p>I think you are onto something. Social Media networks are themselves an extension of one's personality, just like one's membership in a church, professional organization, or any other group. As defined by Erica O'Grady, Social Media is not about the technology but about the relationships. Members of Congress have restrictions against use of government resources to promote their campaign or enrich themselves, such as use of a government office or computer. However, there have never been any rules to my knowledge against use of one's personal networks and personal relationships for legitimate purposes - you are going to communicate with people you know about any number of topics. One's connection to his/her twitter followers, as connected via a free, public domain is in and of itself a relationship. If you bar or restrict the use of twitter, you restrict the relationships, and that is a restriction on our Constitutional right to assembly freely.</p> I think you are onto something. Social Media networks are themselves an extension of one’s personality, just like one’s membership in a church, professional organization, or any other group. As defined by Erica O’Grady, Social Media is not about the technology but about the relationships. Members of Congress have restrictions against use of government resources to promote their campaign or enrich themselves, such as use of a government office or computer. However, there have never been any rules to my knowledge against use of one’s personal networks and personal relationships for legitimate purposes – you are going to communicate with people you know about any number of topics. One’s connection to his/her twitter followers, as connected via a free, public domain is in and of itself a relationship. If you bar or restrict the use of twitter, you restrict the relationships, and that is a restriction on our Constitutional right to assembly freely.

]]> By: Joseph http://techliberation.com/2008/07/18/the-medium-is-not-the-message/comment-page-1/#comment-42752 Joseph Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:59:42 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=11201#comment-42752 <p>I think you are onto something. Social Media networks are themselves an extension of one's personality, just like one's membership in a church, professional organization, or any other group. As defined by Erica O'Grady, Social Media is not about the technology but about the relationships. Members of Congress have restrictions against use of government resources to promote their campaign or enrich themselves, such as use of a government office or computer. However, there have never been any rules to my knowledge against use of one's personal networks and personal relationships for legitimate purposes - you are going to communicate with people you know about any number of topics. One's connection to his/her twitter followers, as connected via a free, public domain is in and of itself a relationship. If you bar or restrict the use of twitter, you restrict the relationships, and that is a restriction on our Constitutional right to assembly freely.</p> I think you are onto something. Social Media networks are themselves an extension of one’s personality, just like one’s membership in a church, professional organization, or any other group. As defined by Erica O’Grady, Social Media is not about the technology but about the relationships. Members of Congress have restrictions against use of government resources to promote their campaign or enrich themselves, such as use of a government office or computer. However, there have never been any rules to my knowledge against use of one’s personal networks and personal relationships for legitimate purposes – you are going to communicate with people you know about any number of topics. One’s connection to his/her twitter followers, as connected via a free, public domain is in and of itself a relationship. If you bar or restrict the use of twitter, you restrict the relationships, and that is a restriction on our Constitutional right to assembly freely.

]]>