
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FISA Warrants vs. Criminal Warrants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee_eff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-52290</link>
		<dc:creator>eee_eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-52290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, now that Halliburton has decided that their headquarters is in Dubai, I think the door is opened.  Of course, that would be like the government spying on itself, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; (Yes, I know that their official position is that the Houston and Dubai are both their dual Headquarters, but I&#039;d say most people realize that&#039;s a cover.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now that Halliburton has decided that their headquarters is in Dubai, I think the door is opened.  Of course, that would be like the government spying on itself, right?<br /><br /><br /><br /> (Yes, I know that their official position is that the Houston and Dubai are both their dual Headquarters, but I&#8217;d say most people realize that&#8217;s a cover.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigma_foundry</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-42535</link>
		<dc:creator>enigma_foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-42535</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, now that Halliburton has decided that their headquarters is in Dubai, I think the door is opened.  Of course, that would be like the government spying on itself, right?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Yes, I know that their official position is that the Houston and Dubai are both their dual Headquarters, but I&#039;d say most people realize that&#039;s a cover.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now that Halliburton has decided that their headquarters is in Dubai, I think the door is opened.  Of course, that would be like the government spying on itself, right?</p>

<p>(Yes, I know that their official position is that the Houston and Dubai are both their dual Headquarters, but I&#8217;d say most people realize that&#8217;s a cover.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-52289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-52289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sean, those are great points that I hadn&#039;t realized. Thanks for commenting!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, those are great points that I hadn&#8217;t realized. Thanks for commenting!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-42534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-42534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sean, those are great points that I hadn&#039;t realized. Thanks for commenting!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, those are great points that I hadn&#8217;t realized. Thanks for commenting!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Donelan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-52288</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Donelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-52288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Counting Title III orders and counting FISA orders are not counting the same things.  FISA orders include physical searches and pen-trap electronic surveillance; which are not included in the Title III data. FISA has also been expanded over the decades to include things which were probably already happening, but weren&#039;t included in the FISA order statistics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2007, there were 457 federal Title III intercept orders authorized; and 33,632 federal search warrants authorized.  In 2004 (the last year I could find publically), there were 5,922 federal pen register orders and 1,336 federal trap-trace orders.  Of course, a single criminal case could have multiple court orders for any of those; and evidence may be used in more than once criminal case.  In addition there are various types of subpoena powers available to criminal investigators to obtain records and information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;State court data is more difficult to find beyond Title III intercept orders, but state courts usually issue more orders of all types (physical searches, pen/trap, intercepts, etc).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree its important to keep a watchful eye on these things.  But I suggest its also important to understand what is and is not being counted in different reports.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counting Title III orders and counting FISA orders are not counting the same things.  FISA orders include physical searches and pen-trap electronic surveillance; which are not included in the Title III data. FISA has also been expanded over the decades to include things which were probably already happening, but weren&#8217;t included in the FISA order statistics.<br /><br />In 2007, there were 457 federal Title III intercept orders authorized; and 33,632 federal search warrants authorized.  In 2004 (the last year I could find publically), there were 5,922 federal pen register orders and 1,336 federal trap-trace orders.  Of course, a single criminal case could have multiple court orders for any of those; and evidence may be used in more than once criminal case.  In addition there are various types of subpoena powers available to criminal investigators to obtain records and information.<br /><br />State court data is more difficult to find beyond Title III intercept orders, but state courts usually issue more orders of all types (physical searches, pen/trap, intercepts, etc).<br /><br />I agree its important to keep a watchful eye on these things.  But I suggest its also important to understand what is and is not being counted in different reports.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Donelan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/07/03/fisa-warrants-vs-criminal-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-42531</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Donelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=11029#comment-42531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Counting Title III orders and counting FISA orders are not counting the same things.  FISA orders include physical searches and pen-trap electronic surveillance; which are not included in the Title III data. FISA has also been expanded over the decades to include things which were probably already happening, but weren&#039;t included in the FISA order statistics.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In 2007, there were 457 federal Title III intercept orders authorized; and 33,632 federal search warrants authorized.  In 2004 (the last year I could find publically), there were 5,922 federal pen register orders and 1,336 federal trap-trace orders.  Of course, a single criminal case could have multiple court orders for any of those; and evidence may be used in more than once criminal case.  In addition there are various types of subpoena powers available to criminal investigators to obtain records and information.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;State court data is more difficult to find beyond Title III intercept orders, but state courts usually issue more orders of all types (physical searches, pen/trap, intercepts, etc).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree its important to keep a watchful eye on these things.  But I suggest its also important to understand what is and is not being counted in different reports.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counting Title III orders and counting FISA orders are not counting the same things.  FISA orders include physical searches and pen-trap electronic surveillance; which are not included in the Title III data. FISA has also been expanded over the decades to include things which were probably already happening, but weren&#8217;t included in the FISA order statistics.</p>

<p>In 2007, there were 457 federal Title III intercept orders authorized; and 33,632 federal search warrants authorized.  In 2004 (the last year I could find publically), there were 5,922 federal pen register orders and 1,336 federal trap-trace orders.  Of course, a single criminal case could have multiple court orders for any of those; and evidence may be used in more than once criminal case.  In addition there are various types of subpoena powers available to criminal investigators to obtain records and information.</p>

<p>State court data is more difficult to find beyond Title III intercept orders, but state courts usually issue more orders of all types (physical searches, pen/trap, intercepts, etc).</p>

<p>I agree its important to keep a watchful eye on these things.  But I suggest its also important to understand what is and is not being counted in different reports.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

