
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ending The War on File Sharing Doesn&#8217;t Mean the End of Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-54295</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-54295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The threat of viruses is a good motivator to not use P2P, and the copyright cartels could take advantage of that by quietly unleashing some pretty horrible ones like ones that corrupt the BIOS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The threat of viruses is a good motivator to not use P2P, and the copyright cartels could take advantage of that by quietly unleashing some pretty horrible ones like ones that corrupt the BIOS.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-42288</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-42288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The threat of viruses is a good motivator to not use P2P, and the copyright cartels could take advantage of that by quietly unleashing some pretty horrible ones like ones that corrupt the BIOS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The threat of viruses is a good motivator to not use P2P, and the copyright cartels could take advantage of that by quietly unleashing some pretty horrible ones like ones that corrupt the BIOS.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-54294</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-54294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the emphasis on networked p2p is misplaced, a tremendous amount of file sharing involves someone plugging in a usb cable.  It will be wonderfully ironic when the next-gen storage medium, the Blu-ray disc, instead of being used to store one 50g HDTV-ready file, is used to store 75 iPhone-ready ones.  The collections boggle the mind -- all Oscar winners since 1931 on one disk, all rat pack, brat pack, and Soderbergh-pack movies in the sleeve of your text book.  At that point people arguing for progress and freedom will insist on the need for blu-ray sniffing dogs in high schools, natch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the emphasis on networked p2p is misplaced, a tremendous amount of file sharing involves someone plugging in a usb cable.  It will be wonderfully ironic when the next-gen storage medium, the Blu-ray disc, instead of being used to store one 50g HDTV-ready file, is used to store 75 iPhone-ready ones.  The collections boggle the mind &#8212; all Oscar winners since 1931 on one disk, all rat pack, brat pack, and Soderbergh-pack movies in the sleeve of your text book.  At that point people arguing for progress and freedom will insist on the need for blu-ray sniffing dogs in high schools, natch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-42286</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-42286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the emphasis on networked p2p is misplaced, a tremendous amount of file sharing involves someone plugging in a usb cable.  It will be wonderfully ironic when the next-gen storage medium, the Blu-ray disc, instead of being used to store one 50g HDTV-ready file, is used to store 75 iPhone-ready ones.  The collections boggle the mind -- all Oscar winners since 1931 on one disk, all rat pack, brat pack, and Soderbergh-pack movies in the sleeve of your text book.  At that point people arguing for progress and freedom will insist on the need for blu-ray sniffing dogs in high schools, natch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the emphasis on networked p2p is misplaced, a tremendous amount of file sharing involves someone plugging in a usb cable.  It will be wonderfully ironic when the next-gen storage medium, the Blu-ray disc, instead of being used to store one 50g HDTV-ready file, is used to store 75 iPhone-ready ones.  The collections boggle the mind &#8212; all Oscar winners since 1931 on one disk, all rat pack, brat pack, and Soderbergh-pack movies in the sleeve of your text book.  At that point people arguing for progress and freedom will insist on the need for blu-ray sniffing dogs in high schools, natch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Appointed Genius</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-54293</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Appointed Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-54293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While forcible attempts to kill file sharing as doomed to failure, that doesn&#039;t mean the phenomenon won&#039;t die off of its own defects.  These P2P networks are littered with viruses, spyware, etc.  That risk drives a lot of people, technical and nontechnical users alike, away from P2P.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This could be especially effective because the nature of the virus is changing.  It used to be that to get a virus you&#039;d have to download an executable, run it, and it would wipe your harddrive.  That&#039;s not true anymore.  Modern malware is about making money.  So we&#039;ll see more ID theft, more spying on your email and bank account, and while worms that jump from machine to machine on their own seem to be a thing of the past, that doesn&#039;t mean a bug in P2P software (which tends to be pretty sketchy) couldn&#039;t be used in such a way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that enough to scare people off of P2P?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, depending on how bad the situation gets, yes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While forcible attempts to kill file sharing as doomed to failure, that doesn&#8217;t mean the phenomenon won&#8217;t die off of its own defects.  These P2P networks are littered with viruses, spyware, etc.  That risk drives a lot of people, technical and nontechnical users alike, away from P2P.<br /><br />This could be especially effective because the nature of the virus is changing.  It used to be that to get a virus you&#8217;d have to download an executable, run it, and it would wipe your harddrive.  That&#8217;s not true anymore.  Modern malware is about making money.  So we&#8217;ll see more ID theft, more spying on your email and bank account, and while worms that jump from machine to machine on their own seem to be a thing of the past, that doesn&#8217;t mean a bug in P2P software (which tends to be pretty sketchy) couldn&#8217;t be used in such a way.<br /><br />Is that enough to scare people off of P2P?<br /><br />Well, depending on how bad the situation gets, yes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Appointed Genius</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/11/ending-the-war-on-file-sharing-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-42283</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Appointed Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10907#comment-42283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While forcible attempts to kill file sharing as doomed to failure, that doesn&#039;t mean the phenomenon won&#039;t die off of its own defects.  These P2P networks are littered with viruses, spyware, etc.  That risk drives a lot of people, technical and nontechnical users alike, away from P2P.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This could be especially effective because the nature of the virus is changing.  It used to be that to get a virus you&#039;d have to download an executable, run it, and it would wipe your harddrive.  That&#039;s not true anymore.  Modern malware is about making money.  So we&#039;ll see more ID theft, more spying on your email and bank account, and while worms that jump from machine to machine on their own seem to be a thing of the past, that doesn&#039;t mean a bug in P2P software (which tends to be pretty sketchy) couldn&#039;t be used in such a way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is that enough to scare people off of P2P?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, depending on how bad the situation gets, yes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While forcible attempts to kill file sharing as doomed to failure, that doesn&#8217;t mean the phenomenon won&#8217;t die off of its own defects.  These P2P networks are littered with viruses, spyware, etc.  That risk drives a lot of people, technical and nontechnical users alike, away from P2P.</p>

<p>This could be especially effective because the nature of the virus is changing.  It used to be that to get a virus you&#8217;d have to download an executable, run it, and it would wipe your harddrive.  That&#8217;s not true anymore.  Modern malware is about making money.  So we&#8217;ll see more ID theft, more spying on your email and bank account, and while worms that jump from machine to machine on their own seem to be a thing of the past, that doesn&#8217;t mean a bug in P2P software (which tends to be pretty sketchy) couldn&#8217;t be used in such a way.</p>

<p>Is that enough to scare people off of P2P?</p>

<p>Well, depending on how bad the situation gets, yes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

