Comments on: Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sun, 27 May 2012 12:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Supreme Court GPS Tracking Case: Round-up and Resources « GEODATA POLICY http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-75189 Supreme Court GPS Tracking Case: Round-up and Resources « GEODATA POLICY Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:57:01 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-75189 <p>[...] Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine [counterpoint], Jim Harper, The Technology Liberation Front, May 30, 2008 [...]</p> [...] Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine [counterpoint], Jim Harper, The Technology Liberation Front, May 30, 2008 [...]

]]> By: A Supreme Court Justice's Radical Proposal Regarding The Privacy of Your Google Searches, Facebook Account & Phone Records - Forbes http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-75170 A Supreme Court Justice's Radical Proposal Regarding The Privacy of Your Google Searches, Facebook Account & Phone Records - Forbes Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:26:26 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-75170 <p>[...] is not a new debate. Back in 2008, law professor Orin Kerr and Cato scholar Jim Harper duked out the question of whether a legal principle that was supposed to make it okay for a [...]</p> [...] is not a new debate. Back in 2008, law professor Orin Kerr and Cato scholar Jim Harper duked out the question of whether a legal principle that was supposed to make it okay for a [...]

]]> By: eee_eff http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-45144 eee_eff Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:46:40 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-45144 <p><i>Kerr spends a good deal of time explaining how third parties like phone companies, ISPs, online banks, and such allow people to hide illegal behavior that would otherwise take place in public.</i><br><br>That's a slippery slope if there ever was one--the same could be said for draperies.</p> Kerr spends a good deal of time explaining how third parties like phone companies, ISPs, online banks, and such allow people to hide illegal behavior that would otherwise take place in public.

That’s a slippery slope if there ever was one–the same could be said for draperies.

]]> By: e_f http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-42112 e_f Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:46:40 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-42112 <p><i>Kerr spends a good deal of time explaining how third parties like phone companies, ISPs, online banks, and such allow people to hide illegal behavior that would otherwise take place in public.</i></p> <p>That's a slippery slope if there ever was one--the same could be said for draperies.</p> Kerr spends a good deal of time explaining how third parties like phone companies, ISPs, online banks, and such allow people to hide illegal behavior that would otherwise take place in public.

That’s a slippery slope if there ever was one–the same could be said for draperies.

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-45143 MikeT Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:32:05 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-45143 <p>Professor Kerr should have no objection to the federal government monitoring every single last action he takes that doesn't happen entirely in his own home. The moment he communicates or interacts with the outside world, the monitoring starts. Everything from grocery records, to bank statements, to emails, all monitored.<br><br>It's the third party rule writ large. He shouldn't have any reason to complain.</p> Professor Kerr should have no objection to the federal government monitoring every single last action he takes that doesn’t happen entirely in his own home. The moment he communicates or interacts with the outside world, the monitoring starts. Everything from grocery records, to bank statements, to emails, all monitored.

It’s the third party rule writ large. He shouldn’t have any reason to complain.

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-42102 MikeT Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:32:05 +0000 http://techliberation.com/?p=10860#comment-42102 <p>Professor Kerr should have no objection to the federal government monitoring every single last action he takes that doesn't happen entirely in his own home. The moment he communicates or interacts with the outside world, the monitoring starts. Everything from grocery records, to bank statements, to emails, all monitored.</p> <p>It's the third party rule writ large. He shouldn't have any reason to complain.</p> Professor Kerr should have no objection to the federal government monitoring every single last action he takes that doesn’t happen entirely in his own home. The moment he communicates or interacts with the outside world, the monitoring starts. Everything from grocery records, to bank statements, to emails, all monitored.

It’s the third party rule writ large. He shouldn’t have any reason to complain.

]]>