<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Shape of the Libertarian &#8220;IP&#8221; Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:45:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SolveigS</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51406</link>
		<dc:creator>SolveigS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51406</guid>
		<description>Whoops. Neither Epstein nor Delong are actually maximalists, who favor &quot;longer, broader, and stricter.&quot; They&#039;re strong supporters of the fundamentals... but in the substantial grey areas around the edges can go either way. See Epstein on Eldred, for example (opposing extension). Delong went the other way on Eldred (favoring extension) but disfavors criminal copyright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re shape: a cube. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re the utilitarians versus the natural lawyers (a Milton term, love it), I ended up going on and on about that and posted later. &quot;Shape&quot; is in the Title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. Neither Epstein nor Delong are actually maximalists, who favor &#8220;longer, broader, and stricter.&#8221; They&#8217;re strong supporters of the fundamentals&#8230; but in the substantial grey areas around the edges can go either way. See Epstein on Eldred, for example (opposing extension). Delong went the other way on Eldred (favoring extension) but disfavors criminal copyright.</p>
<p>Re shape: a cube. </p>
<p>Re the utilitarians versus the natural lawyers (a Milton term, love it), I ended up going on and on about that and posted later. &#8220;Shape&#8221; is in the Title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solveig Singleton</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41639</link>
		<dc:creator>Solveig Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41639</guid>
		<description>Whoops. Neither Epstein nor Delong are actually maximalists, who favor &quot;longer, broader, and stricter.&quot; They&#039;re strong supporters of the fundamentals... but in the substantial grey areas around the edges can go either way. See Epstein on Eldred, for example (opposing extension). Delong went the other way on Eldred (favoring extension) but disfavors criminal copyright.

Re shape: a cube. 

Re the utilitarians versus the natural lawyers (a Milton term, love it), I ended up going on and on about that and posted later. &quot;Shape&quot; is in the Title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. Neither Epstein nor Delong are actually maximalists, who favor &#8220;longer, broader, and stricter.&#8221; They&#8217;re strong supporters of the fundamentals&#8230; but in the substantial grey areas around the edges can go either way. See Epstein on Eldred, for example (opposing extension). Delong went the other way on Eldred (favoring extension) but disfavors criminal copyright.</p>
<p>Re shape: a cube. </p>
<p>Re the utilitarians versus the natural lawyers (a Milton term, love it), I ended up going on and on about that and posted later. &#8220;Shape&#8221; is in the Title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51405</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51405</guid>
		<description>RB, there have been times when a cut would have caused me to bleed green and yellow, yes, especially growing up in the Canseco McGuire Henderson Eckersley era. The Beane era, and dollar Wednesdays, are like the proverbial proof that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB, there have been times when a cut would have caused me to bleed green and yellow, yes, especially growing up in the Canseco McGuire Henderson Eckersley era. The Beane era, and dollar Wednesdays, are like the proverbial proof that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee_eff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51404</link>
		<dc:creator>eee_eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51404</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(I’m going to relax my usual rule about the phrase “IP” because of the way Friedman and Lessig have framed it):&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course RMS also thinks similarly about the IP term:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml&quot;&gt;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(I’m going to relax my usual rule about the phrase “IP” because of the way Friedman and Lessig have framed it):</i></p>
<p>Of course RMS also thinks similarly about the IP term:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41523</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41523</guid>
		<description>RB, there have been times when a cut would have caused me to bleed green and yellow, yes, especially growing up in the Canseco McGuire Henderson Eckersley era. The Beane era, and dollar Wednesdays, are like the proverbial proof that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB, there have been times when a cut would have caused me to bleed green and yellow, yes, especially growing up in the Canseco McGuire Henderson Eckersley era. The Beane era, and dollar Wednesdays, are like the proverbial proof that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigma_foundry</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41522</link>
		<dc:creator>enigma_foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41522</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(I’m going to relax my usual rule about the phrase “IP” because of the way Friedman and Lessig have framed it):&lt;/i&gt;

Of course RMS also thinks similarly about the IP term:


http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(I’m going to relax my usual rule about the phrase “IP” because of the way Friedman and Lessig have framed it):</i></p>
<p>Of course RMS also thinks similarly about the IP term:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51403</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51403</guid>
		<description>Are you an A&#039;s fan, Timon? If that&#039;s the case, I&#039;ll certainly cut you some slack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you an A&#8217;s fan, Timon? If that&#8217;s the case, I&#8217;ll certainly cut you some slack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41511</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41511</guid>
		<description>Are you an A&#039;s fan, Timon? If that&#039;s the case, I&#039;ll certainly cut you some slack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you an A&#8217;s fan, Timon? If that&#8217;s the case, I&#8217;ll certainly cut you some slack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51402</guid>
		<description>Let me second Prof. Friedman&#039;s recommendation of &lt;i&gt;Law&#039;s Order.&lt;/i&gt; It&#039;s a great book and the chapters on copyright and patent law are indeed first rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me second Prof. Friedman&#8217;s recommendation of <i>Law&#8217;s Order.</i> It&#8217;s a great book and the chapters on copyright and patent law are indeed first rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41492</guid>
		<description>Let me second Prof. Friedman&#039;s recommendation of &lt;i&gt;Law&#039;s Order.&lt;/i&gt; It&#039;s a great book and the chapters on copyright and patent law are indeed first rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me second Prof. Friedman&#8217;s recommendation of <i>Law&#8217;s Order.</i> It&#8217;s a great book and the chapters on copyright and patent law are indeed first rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51401</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51401</guid>
		<description>Also, by way of testing how many people are reading this (which I suspect is low) let&#039;s do a benchmark on a flick image of my &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/79112603@N00/780861362/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;insanely gorgeous girlfriend&lt;/a&gt;. (24 views at posting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, by way of testing how many people are reading this (which I suspect is low) let&#8217;s do a benchmark on a flick image of my <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/79112603@N00/780861362/" rel="nofollow">insanely gorgeous girlfriend</a>. (24 views at posting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51400</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51400</guid>
		<description>Richard,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I share your disdain of snot-nose kids such as myself, another of the 99 out of 100 things we agree on.  I meant &#039;sorry&#039; in the straightforward sense, as in, &quot;sorry for the immoderate comments, for dwelling on the other 1%.&quot;  But your pique suggests you are in fact a Fedora victim ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>I share your disdain of snot-nose kids such as myself, another of the 99 out of 100 things we agree on.  I meant &#8217;sorry&#8217; in the straightforward sense, as in, &#8220;sorry for the immoderate comments, for dwelling on the other 1%.&#8221;  But your pique suggests you are in fact a Fedora victim <img src='http://techliberation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41491</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41491</guid>
		<description>Also, by way of testing how many people are reading this (which I suspect is low) let&#039;s do a benchmark on a flick image of my &lt;a href=&#039;http://flickr.com/photos/79112603@N00/780861362/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;insanely gorgeous girlfriend&lt;/a&gt;. (24 views at posting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, by way of testing how many people are reading this (which I suspect is low) let&#8217;s do a benchmark on a flick image of my <a href='http://flickr.com/photos/79112603@N00/780861362/' rel="nofollow">insanely gorgeous girlfriend</a>. (24 views at posting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51399</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51399</guid>
		<description>Grow up, Timon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grow up, Timon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41490</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41490</guid>
		<description>Richard,

I share your disdain of snot-nose kids such as myself, another of the 99 out of 100 things we agree on.  I meant &#039;sorry&#039; in the straightforward sense, as in, &quot;sorry for the immoderate comments, for dwelling on the other 1%.&quot;  But your pique suggests you are in fact a Fedora victim ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>I share your disdain of snot-nose kids such as myself, another of the 99 out of 100 things we agree on.  I meant &#8217;sorry&#8217; in the straightforward sense, as in, &#8220;sorry for the immoderate comments, for dwelling on the other 1%.&#8221;  But your pique suggests you are in fact a Fedora victim <img src='http://techliberation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41489</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41489</guid>
		<description>Grow up, Timon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grow up, Timon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51398</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51398</guid>
		<description>Flemish Belgium is to Holland as&lt;br&gt;Free Software is to Open Source as&lt;br&gt;Northern California is to Southern California as&lt;br&gt;Skiers are to Snowboarders as&lt;br&gt;Leninists are to Trotskyites as&lt;br&gt;Ruby is to Python as&lt;br&gt;Devout Muslims are to Orthodox Jews as&lt;br&gt;Devoted Real Madrid fans are to devoted Barcelona fans, ie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...2 groups who are indistinguishable on 99% of everything and completely identical to the man on the street will let the other 1% dominate their relationship with the other group.  (Sorry Richard Bennett, I observe from your blog that you are even an A&#039;s fan (!).  I suspect that your apparent antipathy to life has to do with not making the switch from Fedora to Ubuntu, am I close?)  It is useful to keep these things in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flemish Belgium is to Holland as<br />Free Software is to Open Source as<br />Northern California is to Southern California as<br />Skiers are to Snowboarders as<br />Leninists are to Trotskyites as<br />Ruby is to Python as<br />Devout Muslims are to Orthodox Jews as<br />Devoted Real Madrid fans are to devoted Barcelona fans, ie</p>
<p>&#8230;2 groups who are indistinguishable on 99% of everything and completely identical to the man on the street will let the other 1% dominate their relationship with the other group.  (Sorry Richard Bennett, I observe from your blog that you are even an A&#8217;s fan (!).  I suspect that your apparent antipathy to life has to do with not making the switch from Fedora to Ubuntu, am I close?)  It is useful to keep these things in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David  Friedman</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-51397</link>
		<dc:creator>David  Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-51397</guid>
		<description>Readers interested in my  view of the IP question--from the perspective of economics, not moral philosophy--may want to look at two chapters in my _Law&#039;s Order_. The first discusses the general question of why it makes sense to treat some things as property and some as commons. The second applies the analysis to patent and copyright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_10.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_11.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers interested in my  view of the IP question&#8211;from the perspective of economics, not moral philosophy&#8211;may want to look at two chapters in my _Law&#8217;s Order_. The first discusses the general question of why it makes sense to treat some things as property and some as commons. The second applies the analysis to patent and copyright.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_10.htm"></a><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/.." rel="nofollow">http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/..</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_11.htm"></a><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/.." rel="nofollow">http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41486</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41486</guid>
		<description>Flemish Belgium is to Holland as
Free Software is to Open Source as
Northern California is to Southern California as
Skiers are to Snowboarders as
Leninists are to Trotskyites as
Ruby is to Python as
Devout Muslims are to Orthodox Jews as
Devoted Real Madrid fans are to devoted Barcelona fans, ie

...2 groups who are indistinguishable on 99% of everything and completely identical to the man on the street will let the other 1% dominate their relationship with the other group.  (Sorry Richard Bennett, I observe from your blog that you are even an A&#039;s fan (!).  I suspect that your apparent antipathy to life has to do with not making the switch from Fedora to Ubuntu, am I close?)  It is useful to keep these things in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flemish Belgium is to Holland as<br />
Free Software is to Open Source as<br />
Northern California is to Southern California as<br />
Skiers are to Snowboarders as<br />
Leninists are to Trotskyites as<br />
Ruby is to Python as<br />
Devout Muslims are to Orthodox Jews as<br />
Devoted Real Madrid fans are to devoted Barcelona fans, ie</p>
<p>&#8230;2 groups who are indistinguishable on 99% of everything and completely identical to the man on the street will let the other 1% dominate their relationship with the other group.  (Sorry Richard Bennett, I observe from your blog that you are even an A&#8217;s fan (!).  I suspect that your apparent antipathy to life has to do with not making the switch from Fedora to Ubuntu, am I close?)  It is useful to keep these things in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David  Friedman</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/04/30/on-the-shape-of-the-libertarian-ip-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41485</link>
		<dc:creator>David  Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/?p=10739#comment-41485</guid>
		<description>Readers interested in my  view of the IP question--from the perspective of economics, not moral philosophy--may want to look at two chapters in my _Law&#039;s Order_. The first discusses the general question of why it makes sense to treat some things as property and some as commons. The second applies the analysis to patent and copyright.

http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_10.htm

http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_11.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers interested in my  view of the IP question&#8211;from the perspective of economics, not moral philosophy&#8211;may want to look at two chapters in my _Law&#8217;s Order_. The first discusses the general question of why it makes sense to treat some things as property and some as commons. The second applies the analysis to patent and copyright.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_10.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_10.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_11.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Laws_Order_draft/laws_order_ch_11.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
