Comments on: Lost Laptop Follies, Part 7: NIH Loses Health Records

By: John Parker

John Parker — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:36:37 +0000

They said they hesitated because of concerns that they would provoke undue alarm.”

By: John Parker

John Parker — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:36:37 +0000

They said they hesitated because of concerns that they would provoke undue alarm.”

By: Ilchi Lee

Ilchi Lee — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:36:37 +0000

They said they hesitated because of concerns that they would provoke undue alarm.”

By: Probiotics

Probiotics — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:39:54 +0000

Probiotic supplements have been shown, to, for example, help regulate the digestive system, strengthen the immune system and help reduce inflammation.

By: Health and sex advise for men

Health and sex advise for men — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:11:33 +0000

Good stuff, this article will really help us specially health concerns.

By: Web Developer

Web Developer — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:22:06 +0000

Trust me we are so close to socialized medicine that it is scary. Last week I interviewed for a web applications development position at NIH. The project is a Personal Health Records (PHR) retention system. Now it is great to have a central collection system but this system is in the reach and control of unscrupulous politicians. Just as the Dept of Commerce census process has been moved to the White House so will your right to medical service will be “adjusted” for the good of the (socialist) party.

By: Harry Duplantis

Harry Duplantis — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:46:01 +0000

your site is on my favorites now

By: rybolov

rybolov — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:59:25 +0000

Hmmm, it seems to me that each agency was required in July 2007 by OMB to have a breach notification policy within 120 days. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/...

Also, just so you know, the Government Accountability Office has nothing to do with accountability, they’re just the auditors for Congress. It sounds loftier than it really is. =)

By: rybolov

rybolov — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:59:10 +0000

Hmmm, it seems to me that each agency was required in July 2007 by OMB to have a breach notification policy within 120 days. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/...

Also, just so you know, the Government Accountability Office has nothing to do with accountability, they’re just the auditors for Congress. It sounds loftier than it really is. =)

By: rybolov

rybolov — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:25 +0000

Hmmm, it seems to me that each agency was required in July 2007 by OMB to have a breach notification policy within 120 days. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-16.pdf

Also, just so you know, the Government Accountability Office has nothing to do with accountability, they’re just the auditors for Congress. It sounds loftier than it really is. =)

By: rybolov

rybolov — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:10 +0000

Hmmm, it seems to me that each agency was required in July 2007 by OMB to have a breach notification policy within 120 days. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-16.pdf

Also, just so you know, the Government Accountability Office has nothing to do with accountability, they’re just the auditors for Congress. It sounds loftier than it really is. =)

By: Steve R.

Steve R. — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:18:21 +0000

Once again its time to point out that computer security is not just a government problem but a problem for everyone. Private industry security is just as lax. To only point out government security shortcomings is one-sided and fails to disclose how pervasive this problem is.
————————————–
The “Laptop Security Blog” contains a post dated March 24, 2008 that: “Hannaford Bros. CEO Ron Hodge has issued a statement this week that 4.2 million of its customers have been exposed to fraud due to a security breach. Fraud has been detected already in 1800 cases.”

also see: http://www.hannaford.com/Contents/News_Events/N...

By: Steve R.

Steve R. — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:18:21 +0000

also see: http://www.hannaford.com/Contents/News_Events/News/News.shtml