Comments on: Broadband For The People http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sun, 27 May 2012 09:34:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: enigma_foundry http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-40702 enigma_foundry Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:53:11 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-40702 <p><i>The interesting and relevant question is whether and to what degree it’s possible to proscribe network management practices which most reasonable people would consider inappropriate without unintentionally preventing network providers from trying to improve their services while earning a competitive return on their investment.</p> <p>My Doublespeak detector meant off on that one, Hance. How about: "Network Neutrality is hard to define." </i></p> The interesting and relevant question is whether and to what degree it’s possible to proscribe network management practices which most reasonable people would consider inappropriate without unintentionally preventing network providers from trying to improve their services while earning a competitive return on their investment.

My Doublespeak detector meant off on that one, Hance. How about: “Network Neutrality is hard to define.”

]]> By: eee_eff http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-44869 eee_eff Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:53:11 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-44869 <p><i>The interesting and relevant question is whether and to what degree it’s possible to proscribe network management practices which most reasonable people would consider inappropriate without unintentionally preventing network providers from trying to improve their services while earning a competitive return on their investment.<br><br>My Doublespeak detector meant off on that one, Hance. How about: "Network Neutrality is hard to define." </i></p> The interesting and relevant question is whether and to what degree it’s possible to proscribe network management practices which most reasonable people would consider inappropriate without unintentionally preventing network providers from trying to improve their services while earning a competitive return on their investment.

My Doublespeak detector meant off on that one, Hance. How about: “Network Neutrality is hard to define.”

]]> By: Richard Bennett http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-40701 Richard Bennett Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:24:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-40701 <p>I'd still like to see more options for home broadband than the two incumbents, but it's clear that additional competitors will have to deploy wireless networks. The open internet rules the net neutrality freaks are proposing are very harmful to wireless networks, of course, and that's why all right-thinking Americans have to oppose them.</p> I’d still like to see more options for home broadband than the two incumbents, but it’s clear that additional competitors will have to deploy wireless networks. The open internet rules the net neutrality freaks are proposing are very harmful to wireless networks, of course, and that’s why all right-thinking Americans have to oppose them.

]]> By: Richard Bennett http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-44868 Richard Bennett Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:24:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-44868 <p>I'd still like to see more options for home broadband than the two incumbents, but it's clear that additional competitors will have to deploy wireless networks. The open internet rules the net neutrality freaks are proposing are very harmful to wireless networks, of course, and that's why all right-thinking Americans have to oppose them.</p> I’d still like to see more options for home broadband than the two incumbents, but it’s clear that additional competitors will have to deploy wireless networks. The open internet rules the net neutrality freaks are proposing are very harmful to wireless networks, of course, and that’s why all right-thinking Americans have to oppose them.

]]>