
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hazlett on the Microsoft Case at 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/comment-page-1/#comment-40500</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/#comment-40500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, if you do google that trademarked verb, the normal answers.com link to the dictionary definition does not come up.  If you google kleenex or xerox, you get an American Heritage definition that acknowledges the trademark and defines the colloquial use.  The same dictionary contains an identical entry for the verb &quot;google&quot;, but apparently they forgot to index that page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, if you do google that trademarked verb, the normal answers.com link to the dictionary definition does not come up.  If you google kleenex or xerox, you get an American Heritage definition that acknowledges the trademark and defines the colloquial use.  The same dictionary contains an identical entry for the verb &#8220;google&#8221;, but apparently they forgot to index that page.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/comment-page-1/#comment-45930</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/#comment-45930</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, if you do google that trademarked verb, the normal &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.com&quot;&gt;answers.com&lt;/a&gt; link to the dictionary definition does not come up.  If you google kleenex or xerox, you get an American Heritage definition that acknowledges the trademark and defines the colloquial use.  The same dictionary contains an identical entry for the verb &quot;google&quot;, but apparently they forgot to index that page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, if you do google that trademarked verb, the normal <a href="http://answers.com">answers.com</a> link to the dictionary definition does not come up.  If you google kleenex or xerox, you get an American Heritage definition that acknowledges the trademark and defines the colloquial use.  The same dictionary contains an identical entry for the verb &#8220;google&#8221;, but apparently they forgot to index that page.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

