<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “The End of Censorship” &#8212; The book I never finished</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/</link>
	<description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/#comment-40469</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/#comment-40469</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Importantly, content controls can be broadly defined to not only include the regulation of “objectionable” content (whatever that might include), but also the promotion of so-called “public interest” content or other media quality objectives.&lt;/em&gt;

Presumably content controls aimed at limiting use of copyrighted material fall under "other media quality objectives" and will suffer the same fate as other controls described here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Importantly, content controls can be broadly defined to not only include the regulation of “objectionable” content (whatever that might include), but also the promotion of so-called “public interest” content or other media quality objectives.</em></p>
<p>Presumably content controls aimed at limiting use of copyrighted material fall under &#8220;other media quality objectives&#8221; and will suffer the same fate as other controls described here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/#comment-45926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/22/%e2%80%9cthe-end-of-censorship%e2%80%9d-the-book-i-never-finished/#comment-45926</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Importantly, content controls can be broadly defined to not only include the regulation of “objectionable” content (whatever that might include), but also the promotion of so-called “public interest” content or other media quality objectives.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Presumably content controls aimed at limiting use of copyrighted material fall under "other media quality objectives" and will suffer the same fate as other controls described here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Importantly, content controls can be broadly defined to not only include the regulation of “objectionable” content (whatever that might include), but also the promotion of so-called “public interest” content or other media quality objectives.</em></p>
<p>Presumably content controls aimed at limiting use of copyrighted material fall under &#8220;other media quality objectives&#8221; and will suffer the same fate as other controls described here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
