
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Danger of &#8220;The Danger of Free&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisw</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-40445</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/#comment-40445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the concept of free web services is dangerous. As a web developer, I have invested years and lots of my own money developing an online content publishing platform aimed at the masses. I intend to charge customers an annual fee to use it. The idea of giving it away for free has been considered but I decided that charging for it was a better option. One company that springs to mind is SmugMug.com - these guys have established a very successful business in a market dominated by a free service - flickr.com . Many people would think that an online photo sharing site where you have to pay is a stupid idea - but SmugMug.com has over 450,000 users - and none of them are using the service for free. Go figure!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the concept of free web services is dangerous. As a web developer, I have invested years and lots of my own money developing an online content publishing platform aimed at the masses. I intend to charge customers an annual fee to use it. The idea of giving it away for free has been considered but I decided that charging for it was a better option. One company that springs to mind is SmugMug.com &#8211; these guys have established a very successful business in a market dominated by a free service &#8211; flickr.com . Many people would think that an online photo sharing site where you have to pay is a stupid idea &#8211; but SmugMug.com has over 450,000 users &#8211; and none of them are using the service for free. Go figure!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisw</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-45982</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/#comment-45982</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the concept of free web services is dangerous. As a web developer, I have invested years and lots of my own money developing an online content publishing platform aimed at the masses. I intend to charge customers an annual fee to use it. The idea of giving it away for free has been considered but I decided that charging for it was a better option. One company that springs to mind is &lt;a href=&quot;http://SmugMug.com&quot;&gt;SmugMug.com&lt;/a&gt; - these guys have established a very successful business in a market dominated by a free service - &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com&quot;&gt;flickr.com&lt;/a&gt; . Many people would think that an online photo sharing site where you have to pay is a stupid idea - but &lt;a href=&quot;http://SmugMug.com&quot;&gt;SmugMug.com&lt;/a&gt; has over 450,000 users - and none of them are using the service for free. Go figure!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the concept of free web services is dangerous. As a web developer, I have invested years and lots of my own money developing an online content publishing platform aimed at the masses. I intend to charge customers an annual fee to use it. The idea of giving it away for free has been considered but I decided that charging for it was a better option. One company that springs to mind is <a href="http://SmugMug.com">SmugMug.com</a> &#8211; these guys have established a very successful business in a market dominated by a free service &#8211; <a href="http://flickr.com">flickr.com</a> . Many people would think that an online photo sharing site where you have to pay is a stupid idea &#8211; but <a href="http://SmugMug.com">SmugMug.com</a> has over 450,000 users &#8211; and none of them are using the service for free. Go figure!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-40444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/#comment-40444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Adam.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Adam.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-45981</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2008/01/16/the-danger-of-the-danger-of-free/#comment-45981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Adam.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Adam.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

