<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why both M and AO ratings for games?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:30:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beijing Hotels Reservation</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-65578</link>
		<dc:creator>Beijing Hotels Reservation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-65578</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Travel Deals</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-62130</link>
		<dc:creator>China Travel Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-62130</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Travel Deals</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-59890</link>
		<dc:creator>China Travel Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-59890</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Travel Deals</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-59596</link>
		<dc:creator>China Travel Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-59596</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Travel Deals</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-59595</link>
		<dc:creator>China Travel Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-59595</guid>
		<description>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different point of view from that post. Interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xvideos</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-58676</link>
		<dc:creator>xvideos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-58676</guid>
		<description>Now many gamers do not like their rating&#039;s result anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now many gamers do not like their rating&#39;s result anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illspirit</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-40156</link>
		<dc:creator>illspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-40156</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don&#039;t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.

After all, there&#039;s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as &quot;obscenity&quot; if shown to a minor. E.G. &quot;Inside Deep Throat&quot; (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), &quot;The Dreamers,&quot; or &quot;Lust, Caution.&quot; Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don&#8217;t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.</p>
<p>After all, there&#8217;s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as &#8220;obscenity&#8221; if shown to a minor. E.G. &#8220;Inside Deep Throat&#8221; (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), &#8220;The Dreamers,&#8221; or &#8220;Lust, Caution.&#8221; Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illspirit</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-46771</link>
		<dc:creator>illspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-46771</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don&#039;t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, there&#039;s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as &quot;obscenity&quot; if shown to a minor. E.G. &quot;Inside Deep Throat&quot; (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), &quot;The Dreamers,&quot; or &quot;Lust, Caution.&quot; Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m not so sure about the X/AO analogy fits. The only reason porn studios don&#8217;t bother getting a NC-17 rating is because they skip theaters and mainstream retail anyway. If they really wanted to waste the money, they probably could.</p>
<p>After all, there&#8217;s a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as &#8220;obscenity&#8221; if shown to a minor. E.G. &#8220;Inside Deep Throat&#8221; (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), &#8220;The Dreamers,&#8221; or &#8220;Lust, Caution.&#8221; Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cord Blomquist</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-40155</link>
		<dc:creator>Cord Blomquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-40155</guid>
		<description>I realize this.  I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated.  In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this.  I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated.  In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cord Blomquist</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-46770</link>
		<dc:creator>Cord Blomquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-46770</guid>
		<description>I realize this.  I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated.  In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this.  I use X only to refer to pornographic movies, which are sometimes, though inaccurately, still referred to as X rated.  In reality, these movies are not rated, as I stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Schoen</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-40154</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Schoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-40154</guid>
		<description>X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17

So MPAA doesn&#039;t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17</a></p>
<p>So MPAA doesn&#8217;t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Schoen</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/comment-page-1/#comment-46769</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Schoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/14/why-both-m-and-ao-ratings-for-games/#comment-46769</guid>
		<description>X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So MPAA doesn&#039;t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X used to be an MPAA movie rating, but has subsequently been replaced by NC-17.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_replaced_by_NC-17"></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_.." rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_..</a>.</p>
<p>So MPAA doesn&#8217;t retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
