
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heard of ACAP Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-40066</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/#comment-40066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A quick review of the ACAP website, through its silence, discloses some major unstated operational issues with the application of this technology.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First, who determines the suitability of using ACAP to &quot;protect&quot; content? I assume from reading the FAQ sheet that it is at the sole discretion of the publisher.  But what if the publisher implements this so-called &quot;protection&quot; for content that is really in the public domain? What can then  be done to then disable the use of ACAP?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Second, what happens when content falls out of copyright protection into the public domain.  How would ACAP then be disabled?&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really like how these companies abuse the English language with Orwellian Newspeak.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In limiting content access ACAP claims it is &lt;i&gt;&quot;Unlocking Content for all.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AACS claims that the use of DRM technologies which restricts how HD content is displayed is &lt;i&gt; &quot;Accelerating the release of next-generation content.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick review of the ACAP website, through its silence, discloses some major unstated operational issues with the application of this technology.</p>

<p>First, who determines the suitability of using ACAP to &#8220;protect&#8221; content? I assume from reading the FAQ sheet that it is at the sole discretion of the publisher.  But what if the publisher implements this so-called &#8220;protection&#8221; for content that is really in the public domain? What can then  be done to then disable the use of ACAP?</p>

<h2>Second, what happens when content falls out of copyright protection into the public domain.  How would ACAP then be disabled?</h2>

<p>I really like how these companies abuse the English language with Orwellian Newspeak.</p>

<p>In limiting content access ACAP claims it is <i>&#8220;Unlocking Content for all.&#8221;</i></p>

<p>AACS claims that the use of DRM technologies which restricts how HD content is displayed is <i> &#8220;Accelerating the release of next-generation content.&#8221;</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47343</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/12/03/heard-of-acap-yet/#comment-47343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A quick review of the ACAP website, through its silence, discloses some major unstated operational issues with the application of this technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, who determines the suitability of using ACAP to &quot;protect&quot; content? I assume from reading the FAQ sheet that it is at the sole discretion of the publisher.  But what if the publisher implements this so-called &quot;protection&quot; for content that is really in the public domain? What can then  be done to then disable the use of ACAP?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, what happens when content falls out of copyright protection into the public domain.  How would ACAP then be disabled?&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;I really like how these companies abuse the English language with Orwellian Newspeak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In limiting content access ACAP claims it is &lt;i&gt;&quot;Unlocking Content for all.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AACS claims that the use of DRM technologies which restricts how HD content is displayed is &lt;i&gt; &quot;Accelerating the release of next-generation content.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick review of the ACAP website, through its silence, discloses some major unstated operational issues with the application of this technology.<br /><br />First, who determines the suitability of using ACAP to &#8220;protect&#8221; content? I assume from reading the FAQ sheet that it is at the sole discretion of the publisher.  But what if the publisher implements this so-called &#8220;protection&#8221; for content that is really in the public domain? What can then  be done to then disable the use of ACAP?<br /><br />Second, what happens when content falls out of copyright protection into the public domain.  How would ACAP then be disabled?<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />I really like how these companies abuse the English language with Orwellian Newspeak.<br /><br />In limiting content access ACAP claims it is <i>&#8220;Unlocking Content for all.&#8221;</i><br /><br />AACS claims that the use of DRM technologies which restricts how HD content is displayed is <i> &#8220;Accelerating the release of next-generation content.&#8221;</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

