
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Martin To Declare Cable State of Emergency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike Elliott</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-39869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/#comment-39869</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right on.  Mr. Martin has an agenda and he is intent on pursuing it even if the Cable Act doesn&#039;t support his actions.  He might wish there was a 70-56 rule, but there isn&#039;t one, and until congress passes another Cable Act with a 7-56 rule, I think Martin is on thin ice if he tries to extend the FCC&#039;s power to further regulate Cable.  I posted on this on my blog a few days ago, at http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/fcc-regulatory-.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on.  Mr. Martin has an agenda and he is intent on pursuing it even if the Cable Act doesn&#8217;t support his actions.  He might wish there was a 70-56 rule, but there isn&#8217;t one, and until congress passes another Cable Act with a 7-56 rule, I think Martin is on thin ice if he tries to extend the FCC&#8217;s power to further regulate Cable.  I posted on this on my blog a few days ago, at <a href="http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/fcc-regulatory-.html" rel="nofollow">http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/fcc-regulatory-.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike Elliott</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-47621</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/11/14/general-martin-to-declare-cable-state-of-emergency/#comment-47621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right on.  Mr. Martin has an agenda and he is intent on pursuing it even if the Cable Act doesn&#039;t support his actions.  He might wish there was a 70-56 rule, but there isn&#039;t one, and until congress passes another Cable Act with a 7-56 rule, I think Martin is on thin ice if he tries to extend the FCC&#039;s power to further regulate Cable.  I posted on this on my blog a few days ago, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/fcc-regulatory-.html&quot;&gt;http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on.  Mr. Martin has an agenda and he is intent on pursuing it even if the Cable Act doesn&#8217;t support his actions.  He might wish there was a 70-56 rule, but there isn&#8217;t one, and until congress passes another Cable Act with a 7-56 rule, I think Martin is on thin ice if he tries to extend the FCC&#8217;s power to further regulate Cable.  I posted on this on my blog a few days ago, at <a href="http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/fcc-regulatory-.html">http://ikeelliott.typepad.com/telecosm/2007/11/&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

