http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-39819 MikeT Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:58:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/#comment-39819 <p>What happens when they are not far off from the truth, Don? There are many people, especially those in the developing countries, that would love to see a socialist system develop for medical intellectual property. That should be vigorously opposed, as it has been the free market, not governments directing research and development, that has lead to the creation of the medical advances we have today.</p> What happens when they are not far off from the truth, Don? There are many people, especially those in the developing countries, that would love to see a socialist system develop for medical intellectual property. That should be vigorously opposed, as it has been the free market, not governments directing research and development, that has lead to the creation of the medical advances we have today.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-45949 MikeT Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:58:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/#comment-45949 <p>What happens when they are not far off from the truth, Don? There are many people, especially those in the developing countries, that would love to see a socialist system develop for medical intellectual property. That should be vigorously opposed, as it has been the free market, not governments directing research and development, that has lead to the creation of the medical advances we have today.</p> What happens when they are not far off from the truth, Don? There are many people, especially those in the developing countries, that would love to see a socialist system develop for medical intellectual property. That should be vigorously opposed, as it has been the free market, not governments directing research and development, that has lead to the creation of the medical advances we have today.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-39818 Don Marti Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:17:08 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/#comment-39818 <p>Another good "think tank" name: <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=International_Policy_Network" rel="nofollow">International Policy Network</a>. Why do lazy editors run these flacks' op-ed pieces without at least mentioning who they're really working for in the author blurb? (The IT media has the same problem, plus marketing "analysts".)</p> Another good “think tank” name: International Policy Network. Why do lazy editors run these flacks’ op-ed pieces without at least mentioning who they’re really working for in the author blurb? (The IT media has the same problem, plus marketing “analysts”.)

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-45948 Don Marti Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:17:08 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/11/08/the-proposed-who-rd-treaty/#comment-45948 <p>Another good "think tank" name: <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=International_Policy_Network" rel="nofollow">International Policy Network</a>. Why do lazy editors run these flacks' op-ed pieces without at least mentioning who they're really working for in the author blurb? (The IT media has the same problem, plus marketing "analysts".)</p> Another good “think tank” name: International Policy Network. Why do lazy editors run these flacks’ op-ed pieces without at least mentioning who they’re really working for in the author blurb? (The IT media has the same problem, plus marketing “analysts”.)

]]>